You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 22 Next »

(2019-10-28 meeting cancelled. Meeting moved to 11-12-2019.)

Materials:

CNTT Structure Document Status

CNTT Structure Questions as of 2019-10-07v2.pdf

Attendees:

Mark Cottrell

Rick Tennant (AT&T)

Jim Baker

Beth Cohen (Verizon)

Jonathan Beltran

Phil Robb (Ericsson)

Rabi Abdel (Vodafone)

William Diego Maza




Agenda Topics:

  • Scope of Work Stream:
    • Define community strategies that align with Common NFVI mission, objectives & outcomes
      • Discussion: Do individuals feel our strategies are well known and understood?
    • Review & assess community success measures for required action(s)
      • Discussion: How do we measures overall success?
      • Discussion: Does the broader community agree on our measures?
    • Ensure compliance within the community to policies, process, & principle
      • Discussion
        • Onboarding
        • Organizational Structure and Workstreams
        • Governance and Technical Work Stream Nominations and Selections 
        • Voting and Approval
        • Relationship to GSMA and LFN
  • How to Leverage WS Contributors?
    • Discussion
      • Creating documentation
      • Project management and coordination 
      • Systems Implementation
      • Testing Development
      • Code Development
      • Other?
  •  CNTT Technical F2F Work Shop (January 2020) 

Notes:

Scope

  • Proliferating workstreams and insufficient people to work on all of them Beth Cohen
    • 3 delivery teams - RM, RA, RI/RC
    • Supply vs. Demand - reduce scope(pacing) OR add resources
  • Teams not focused on the workstream at hand Rabi Abdel
    • Could adopt a 6 mo release cycle to sync with ONS AND shift to bi-weekly meetings
  • Is there a better way to structure the process and workflow? Jonathan Beltran
  • Summary Mark Cottrell
    • Cadence is an opportunity
    • Recruitment from the edge (not carriers, new members)
      • user-20f1f
        • Near edge - surge of resources post-Paris
        • E.g. using E/// as example, more engaged now than 3 weeks ago.
        • RA and RI and RC activities spinning up at same time makes for some slowdown.
        • Taking folks awhile to get drawn into conversation.
        • There is a want to engage more but need time to gel. "Rubber still hitting the role"
    • Idea - can we get a SPOC per org? Assess where org should contribute? RA, RI, RC? etc. alot of questions, e.g. 4 folks from same org. Rabi Abdel
      • Discussion - for some companies that might work, others not. More siloed companies would help, more distributed companies not so much. Mark Cottrell
      • If 3-4 months it takes to onboard, then all resources onboarded post ONS Antwerp not being effective yet in current release cycle. 
      • AI - Mark Cottrell going to summarize on directions to take on this and propose.
  • No labels