Date
Attendees
LF staff: Jim Baker Jill Lovato Heather Kirksey David McBride Kenny Paul
EUAG: Atul Purohit Saad Ullah Sheikh Brian Freeman Marc-Alexandre Choquette @javier Ger Randy Levensalor
Guests: Scott Blandford
Agenda
- Start the Recording
- Antitrust Policy
- Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)
- EUAG chair elections Jim Baker
- DDF results review, action items and next steps Atul Purohit
- LFN MAC positioning statement - Q&A (previously distributed via email) Heather Kirksey
- L0/L1 Optical Networks Carrier Interconnection – scope : ONAP/CCVPN and ODL/Transport-pce” Brian Freeman Olivier Augizeau
Minutes
- EUAG chair elections
- Atul Purohit nominated and was unoppoosed - Congratulations Atul our new EUAG chair!
- DDF results review Atul Purohit
- Review of the DDF discussions
- See demo page
- Atul to look at options to track action items - AI on the minutes OR using EUAG jira
- LFN MAC positioning statement Heather Kirksey Jill Lovato
- Pointer from Email send by Brandon Wick
- Messaging is LFN wide - not project specific
- Questions:
- ONAP is not a standard - rather it's based on ETSI/GSMA/etc. - is there some documentation of the relationship between the projects and the SDOs?
- ONAP has specific liaisons but not a centralized source of LFN SDO engagements - readouts are given at TSC meetings from time to time
- There is some written agreement with ETSI, can you describe this?
- ONAP is broader than ETSI - but don't know the scope of the agreement
- With ETSI there is an agreement of ONAP subset implemented
- AI - provide the ETSI/ONAP agreement Jim Baker
- The value to service providers having a service that works with existing OAM (interop AND operationally compatible)
- Both a reduction of effort and clarity of responsibility/reduced TTM
- Telcos VS over-the-top players rate of change is very high - LFN helps this competitive pace
- Consistent architecture is another benefit - SDOs do not help get consistent implementation - just consensus
- Seems a little ONAP centric - are there other project related proof points?
- Perhaps a case study may be more appropriate?
- Go direct to the ODL technical community - Contact Casey Cain
- Perhaps a case study may be more appropriate?
- ONAP is not a standard - rather it's based on ETSI/GSMA/etc. - is there some documentation of the relationship between the projects and the SDOs?
- L0/L1 Optical Networks Carrier Interconnection – scope : ONAP/CCVPN and ODL/Transport-pce Brian Freeman
- Presentation intention - share activities and seek engagement
- @Javier - Fragmentation between LFN projects and SDOs
- connection between ONAP and BSS is poorly defined - is there an effort to standardize?
- Brian Freeman more work needed, MEF & TMF discussions are necessary to understand the different approaches
- Calls are Wednesdays @ 8AM Eastern https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Meeting+Minutes+-+Optical+Usecase - Contact Denise Provencher for invite (denise.provencher@us.fujitsu.com)
- slides presented during the call
Action items
- Heather Kirksey Jim Baker Compile a list of SDO engagements and ecosystem relationships
- Brian Freeman attach slides to wiki minutes and info for the Multi-domain Optical Network Services meeting times