Attendees:
Please add your name in here:
- Peter Woerndle (Ericsson)
- Gergely Csatari (Nokia)
- Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)
- Mark Shostak
- Pankaj Goyal (AT&T)
- Rabi Abdel (Vodafone)
- ramki krishnan (VMware)
- Saad Ullah Sheikh (STC)
- Toshiyasu Wakayama (KDDI)
- Jussi Nummelin (Mirantis)
Agenda and Minutes:
- Antitrust notices
- Walk-in items:
- Issue 1112 (about CNI/networking solutions) - got me (Tom Kivlin) thinking about the flow of the document and I have proposed a "principle" or approach: https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/1112#issuecomment-601162790
- Agreed to follow the approach suggested
- Gergely Csatari to create an issue to implement the approach with a note that in some chapter we need to define that CNI should be part of the architecture at least for the primary interface.
- Discuss entries in table 4.5 which don't have a requirement mapping to req nos. - https://cntt-n.github.io/CNTT/doc/ref_arch/kubernetes/chapters/chapter04.html - ramki krishnan
- Cluster wide IP address management
- It is a good thing to be able to do, but should not be mandated
- Change it to cluster wide coordination of IP address assignement
- Add it as a requirement
- Service based discovery of all provisioned interfaces
- Capability to use any interfaces with a Kubernetes Service if the interface is designed to work with Kubernetes Services
- Add it as a requirement
- Gergely Csatari create an issue about this
- Cluster wide IP address management
- We should investigate is we would like to enforce Kubernetes Ingress and Egress Policies
- Gergely Csatari to create an issue about this
- We should investigate if we would like to use Kubernetes Load Balancing
- Gergely Csatari to create an issue about this
- Issue 1112 (about CNI/networking solutions) - got me (Tom Kivlin) thinking about the flow of the document and I have proposed a "principle" or approach: https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/1112#issuecomment-601162790
- Agenda:
- Project Review: https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/projects/10
- https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/pull/1185
- We agreed, that it is okay to remove the packaging requirement
- https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/pull/1247
- It was already agreed, that LCM of the Kubernetes cluster is out of scope
- https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/950
- Peter Woerndle to send links to vendor specification when a specific host OS is requested
- It was agreed to add a statement that the infrastructure should not require any specific OS in the container base image
- https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/1004
- The question of user-0322e was answered
- https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/1279
- Gergely Csatari to react to this
- AOB
- N/A