Date

 

Attendees

LF Staff: Kenny Paul Brandon Wick Jim Baker
Committee Members: Randy Levensalor Lei Huang  Scott Blandford
Proxies:
Guests: 

Agenda

Minutes

 EUAG Calendar vs. Spring time change

  • this time slot will conflict with the TAC meeting beginning on the 24th of the month
  • recommendation to move this meeting to an hour earlier


NFV Testing White Paper

  • Split content of original white paper into a case study and more of a academic white paper (2 papers)
  • Main paper ~50% editing complete; second paper needs a full editing cycle

AI/ML data and model sharing project proposal

  • Only vendors have responded to this
  • Call to action for operators to participate
  • Randy Levensalor Cablelabs still about 12 months out from being able to actively particapate.
  • Scott Blandford will reachout within AT&T
  • Jim Baker will send a reminder to the email list.


Enterprise EUAG

  • Enterprise EUAG.pptx
  • Current EUAG is chartered by LFN Governing Board
  • LFN GB has asked that we begin to explore serving the "Enterprise Networking" vertical 
  • EUAG working well, do not want to disrupt
  • Scott Blandford There is considerable overlap in topics is this an artificial division
  • Potential conflict of interest by inviting "vendor companies" that have enterprise networks to the single forum
  • Proposal is to create 2 separate advisory groups 
  • Lei Huang Too many meetings AND considerable overlap in topics may make is difficult for current members
  • Randy Levensalor There is a need to align the interests between the groups as there are the same number of underlying projects - if there are separate groups, perhaps periodic sync meetings would bring together all the vertical groups
  • Brandon Wick Previous EUAG tried to recruit other verticals and failed to get critical mass
  • Jim Baker Perhaps focus groups for enterprise for a couple months, then fold them into EUAG
  • Scott Blandford Perhaps have both "user groups" and "end user advisory group" - providing ONE set of priorities to the LFN projects would be desirable 
  • Kenny Paul Limit participation to those that OPERATE the enterprise networks via a charter change

Action items

  •