LFN GB has asked that we begin to explore serving the "Enterprise Networking" vertical
EUAG working well, do not want to disrupt
Scott Blandford There is considerable overlap in topics is this an artificial division
Potential conflict of interest by inviting "vendor companies" that have enterprise networks to the single forum
Proposal is to create 2 separate advisory groups
Lei Huang Too many meetings AND considerable overlap in topics may make is difficult for current members
Randy Levensalor There is a need to align the interests between the groups as there are the same number of underlying projects - if there are separate groups, perhaps periodic sync meetings would bring together all the vertical groups
Brandon Wick Previous EUAG tried to recruit other verticals and failed to get critical mass
Jim Baker Perhaps focus groups for enterprise for a couple months, then fold them into EUAG
Scott Blandford Perhaps have both "user groups" and "end user advisory group" - providing ONE set of priorities to the LFN projects would be desirable
Kenny Paul Limit participation to those that OPERATE the enterprise networks via a charter change
Action items
Type your task here. Use "@" to assign a user and "//" to select a due date.