We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
Casey Cain presented the revised lifecycle state documentation for review.
Frank Brockners We need to add some additional language that expresses that projects with overlapping technologies to existing LFN projects are still welcome.
Document is more of a compliance doc than a marketing or sales slanted document . We need something that talks about why to join LFN.
Ranny Haiby took the action item to provide some language
Casey Cain The TAC should review, provide comments and be prepared to vote on the document by the next TAC meeting held on
Infrastructure beyond Atlassian
Casey Cain discussed the need for the community to advise the LFN of their preferences for alternative tools to replace JIRA and Confluence.
Casey noted that the services would no longer be available in 2024 and that we need to start developing a migration plan within the next few months.
Kenny noted that GitHub and GitLab currently have the most mature integration with Linux Foundation tooling such as LFX and will likely be the default options. However, it is important for the community to provide their feedback.
Muddasar Ahmed agreed to take the question to the ONAP community.