Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata




  • Review action items for operations/TSC
  • Discuss all AIs with MeldOps  tag

Discussion items

  • Proposed converged workflow OR keep separate workflows?
    • CNTT been using github; OPNFV using gerrit
    • gitlab/gitlab CI is the LF strategic direction
      • Timeframe? POC running in 2020 - decision on wide scale adoption in 2021
        • OPNFV projects StorPerf and Kuberef in proof of concept
    • gitlab has more tools - issue trackers, wiki... - is it gitlab for CI/repos OR more of the tool chain?
      • Jira and Confluence strongly integrated == more value
      • defer supporting tools and just focus on CI/repo management
    • Would it help RI work if the tool chain were the same?
      • RTD workflow the same
      • CI integration is the challenging area 
        • OPNFV has sep group managing the CI process
        • gitlab enables each project to manage their own CI tools
      • Merge mindset and issue tracking unification would be helped by common tools
      • How are dependencies tracked from specs to RI code changes?
        • not tracked today
    • Proposal: Continue using current tools and defer any migration to gitlab
      • Elbrus release stay on github - then converge on a common tool chain
      • Is there a short term convergence step?
        • Yes, but that would be a multi-step move (more pain)
      • Directional agreement on converged toolchain - question is on priority
  • Define PROPOSAL for the day-in-the-life of the future TSC and discuss the needed operational support (inputs/outputs)
    • Develop a straw-proposal for the TSC workflow and refine as we go
    • OPNFV TSC workflow is largely defined by the charter
    • Communicate back to Org/Gov our dependencies on the operational procedures
      • Who of TSC, how long are secondary decisions
      • OPNFV has the charter and operational procedures, where is the CNTT similar docs?
    • Schedule a separate meeting and propose the TSC operations 

  • sunku ranganath Presented some materials on organizing around areas of interest
    • Operationally - have small working groups that bring together the architects and developer to identify gaps and create plans to address the issues
    • Good taxonomy developed as a work in progress: MeldOperations-Domains.pptx

Action items


1 Comment

  1. See for updated input collected from OPNFV's literature.

    1. You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.