Attendees:
Please add your name in here:
- Kelvin Edmison (Nokia)
- Mark Shostak
- Pankaj Goyal (AT&T)
- Al Morton (AT&T)
- Walter Kozlowski (Telstra)
- Karine Sevilla (Orange)
- Tomas Fredberg (Ericsson)
- Trevor Cooper (Intel)
- Rabi Abdel (VF)
- Petar Torre (Intel)
- shasha guo (ChinaMobile)
Special Notes:
- Given the limited time available, we will focus on identifying issues/actions/next steps, but not solving them right now
- Weekly RM meetings are intended to
- Identify owners for new Issues
- Track open Issues
- Address technical issues that cannot be resolved online (i.e. resolve stalls)
Agenda:
- Linux Foundation Anti-Trust Policy Notice
- GSMA Anti-Trust Policy Notice
- Agenda bashing
- Review Baldy release priorities
- Call to self-assign work items that are not tagged as backlog
- https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ARM+-label%3ABacklog
- Preferentially tackle these over items that are currently in the backlog
- RM Core (status)
- VNF Evolution Strategy https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/1007 sub-issues 1, 3 still open
- Discuss sub-issue 1 here: workload scheduling
- OpenStack suggests that in many cases Flavours are preferred to scheduler_hints
- https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/scheduler-hints-vs-flavor-extra-specs.html
- Can we adopt this as the conclusion to sub-issue 1?
- VNF Evolution Strategy https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/1007 sub-issues 1, 3 still open
- Open questions
- TBD
- New Business
Actions:
- General
- Document decision (flowing from #1007) about choosing Flavours over scheduler_hints
- based on discoverability, absence of traceability from scheduler_hints option, and based on openstack recommendation link
- Note in RM that compute flavour is parked, but don't remove it from the Reference Model entirely as we are re-adding it soon.
- Document decision (flowing from #1007) about choosing Flavours over scheduler_hints
- Core
- None at this time
- Ops
- None at this time
- Comp
- None at this time