Slide # | Material | Feedback: comments, questions, Workstream(s) lead/co-lead role interest |
---|
2 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 2 - Organizational Structure.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
| e.g. Jonathan Beltran - (comment, questions, workstream role interest) |
3 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 3 - Governance Workstreams and Structure.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
4 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 4 - Governance Workstreams Leads-Co-Leads.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
5 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 5 - Governance Workstreams Scope.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
6 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 6 - Governance Workstreams Scope.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
7 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 7 - Technical Workstreams and Structure.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
8 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 8 - Technical Steering.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
9 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 9 - Deciding on Technical Roadmap.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
10 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 10 - Technical Workstreams Leads-Co-Leads.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
11 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 11 - RM Technical Workstreams Scope.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
12 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 12 - RA Technical Workstreams Scope.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
13 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 13 - RA 2 Technical Workstreams Scope.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
14 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 14 - RI 1 Technical Workstreams Scope.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
|
|
15 | View file |
---|
name | Slide 15 - RC Techncial Workstreams Scope.pdf |
---|
height | 150 |
---|
|
| Cédric Ollivier: Could we get additional details about these workstreams? I haven't seen any first draft/meeting in Antwerp. |
16-24 | Contributions Process - See document CNTT Structure | Cédric Ollivier: I would have strongly considered an opensource model (see OPNFV) based on meritocraty instead of nominating people regarding the nature of their companies by laws. All contribution statistics (pull requests, bugs, comments on pull/requests) are available from the beginning which eases selecting the best committers. I disagree with the current 2 operators + 2 vendors requirements to merge changes even if I understand we can improve the process sometimes wrong during Botrange. It seems falsy to ask for 4 committers to merge a pull regarding regarding the number of current active committers (ratio 1:1?). Then I consider once again that selecting the nature of company is not right from a meritocracy. I would proposed 2 committers only from 2 different companies excluding the author's one. (1 committer could be considered depending on the number of contributors). |
25-27 | Meeting Structure - See document CNTT Structure |
|