Versions Compared

Old Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Rabi Abdel

Saved on

compared with

New Version 10

changes.mady.by.user Cedric Ollivier

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Slide #MaterialFeedback: comments, questions, Workstream(s) lead/co-lead role interest
2

View file
nameSlide 2 - Organizational Structure.pdf
height150

e.g. Jonathan Beltran - (comment, questions, workstream role interest)

3

View file
nameSlide 3 - Governance Workstreams and Structure.pdf
height150


4

View file
nameSlide 4 - Governance Workstreams Leads-Co-Leads.pdf
height150


5

View file
nameSlide 5 - Governance Workstreams Scope.pdf
height150


6

View file
nameSlide 6 - Governance Workstreams Scope.pdf
height150


7

View file
nameSlide 7 - Technical Workstreams and Structure.pdf
height150


8

View file
nameSlide 8 - Technical Steering.pdf
height150


9

View file
nameSlide 9 - Deciding on Technical Roadmap.pdf
height150


10

View file
nameSlide 10 - Technical Workstreams Leads-Co-Leads.pdf
height150


11

View file
nameSlide 11 - RM Technical Workstreams Scope.pdf
height150


12

View file
nameSlide 12 - RA Technical Workstreams Scope.pdf
height150


13

View file
nameSlide 13 - RA 2 Technical Workstreams Scope.pdf
height150


14

View file
nameSlide 14 - RI 1 Technical Workstreams Scope.pdf
height150


15

View file
nameSlide 15 - RC Techncial Workstreams Scope.pdf
height150


16-24Contributions Process - See document CNTT Structure

Cédric Ollivier:

I would have strongly considered an opensource model (see OPNFV) based on meritocraty instead of nominating people regarding the nature of their companies by laws. All contribution statistics (pull requests, bugs, comments on pull/requests) are available from the beginning which ease selecting the best committers.

I disagree with the current 2 operators + 2 vendors requirements to merges change even if I understand we can improve the process sometimes wrong during Botrange.

It seems falsy to ask for 4 committers to merge a pull regarding regarding the number of current active committers (ratio 1:1?). Then I consider once again that selecting the nature of company is not right from a meritocracy.

I would proposed 2 committers only from 2 different companies excluding the author's one. (1 committer could be considered depending on the number of contributors).

25-27Meeting Structure - See document CNTT Structure

...