Page History

Ignacio Más, 

Senior Expert head of technology innovation in OS

Heather Kirksey Catherine Lefevre

Kenny Paul

David McBride

Introduce how to automate deploy vCPE of TOSCA with HPA use case. 

Qihui Zhao

Srinivasa Addepalli

Samuli Silvius

Maciej Gawel

Present current Samsung experiences with CNF infrastructure (outside of ONAP) and discuss how it applies to and can be leveraged in ONAP solution.

In industries, many commercial SDN products have been rolled out based on Opendaylight, but Opendaylight community release is not ready to enter super scale data center which has 1000+ servers, reliability, horizontal scalability and performance are fundamental requirements, this presentation will point out current scalability issues and possible solutions and propose some effort directions in the future ODL development, also encourage PTLs can participate in discussion and elaborate scalability issues in every project and propose some good solutions. Cloud data center is a critical area Opendaylight must take care of if we want to keep Opendaylight successful continuously.

Seshu Kumar Mudiganti

This discussion / presentation will give insights to understand the concepts and implementation details behid the SO building blocks, the idea is to make it as simple as possible for someone new to ONAP able to appreciate and use the existing building blocks and futher build / enhance their own on the top.

SO Building blocks.pdf

Sofia Wallin

Short term and long term improvements. Followup on ongoing activities. El Alto planning. 

API Documentation Eric Debeau : lessons learnt from existing Documentation. Proposal to verify API compliancy and to use another visualistaion tool for API documentation 

Security and Documentation Eric Debeau , Natacha Mach , Pawel Pawlak : How to better document the various ONAP components and their open ports.

Archi and Documentation Stephen Terrill : how to join efforts for a better documentation. Architecture project started to describe functional view of various ONAP components. How can we ruse it for official documentation ?

End to End Documentation Andreas Geissler Thomas Kulik Eric Debeau : How to better describe how to use ONAP

Structure of  Documentation Andreas Geissler Thomas Kulik : Proposal for discussion (see here; please download and open in browser)

Review of documentation milestones & documentation release process Jim BakerCatherine Lefevre Sofia Wallin

Junfeng Wang Hongjun Ni

Will share online, sorry for that we cannot go there.

Jim Baker

Two main topics:

1. El Alto milestones and release plan
2. Frankfurt milestones and release plan

 Andy Mayer

Hui Deng

 Modeling subcommitee weekly meeting

Pamela Dragosh

Liam Fallon

The architecture and the implementation of the ONAP Policy Framework was substantially upgraded in the ONAP Dublin release. In this talk, we present the evolved ONAP Policy Framework discussing the most important improvements, and describing the evolved architecture of the Policy Framework. We highlight the power of TOSCA Policy Types and how they can be used to build translation applications.

Ram Krishna Verma

& "The Policy Team"

Present the new components of Policy Framework using an OOM deployment of ONAP.

Go through each of them one by one explaining the deployment structure.

And then finally showing a demo of creating & deploying policy in a pdp engine using the new architecture.

Note: Recording is covered in the one just above this one.

The postman collection used for demo is attached below.

Support PNF in-place software upgrade in ONAP Frankfurt

Gervais-Martial Ngueko

Control Loop Sub Committee

recording of the session:

Ctrl-Sub Committee FrankFurt planning session recording

Gervais-Martial Ngueko

Control Loop Sub Committee

Working session deep dive into 1-3 functional requirements. 20 minutes per topic.

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/

Self+

Serve+

Control+Loops - 

Gervais-Martial Ngueko

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Metadata+Driven+Control+Loops - Liam Fallon

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/PNF+support+in+Control+Loops - Liam Fallon

recording of the session:

June_SwedenDDF_CtrLoop_DeepDive.mp4

yaoguang wang

Based on the current CDS mechanism, present the support of provisioning management service, especially for 5G RAN NRM.

Samuli Kuusela , Security Sub-Committee

Everyone is welcome to join! And give written comments in Jira, see link below.

This is continuation of review of the ONAP Security requirements. We use Jira tickets for conducting the reviews: https://jira.onap.org/browse/SECCOM-103?jql=project%20%3D%20SECCOM%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20ONAPSECURITYREQUIREMENT%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20ASC. As of May 16, requirements up to & including Jira ticket SECCOM-164 have been reviewed.

Byung-Woo Jun

,

@Michael Morris.

@Gareth Roper,

Seshu Kumar Mudiganti

Yan Yang

Presentation of ETSI SOL003 Adapter Plugin support for SVNFM and adapter enhancement roadmap for El Alto and Frankfurt

• Architecture and Features
• Technical debt

• Refactoring for Frankfurt
• Futuristic thoughts around the SOL003 adapter and its possible placement in the ONAP deployment (Food for thought)
  • Possible placement options
  • Package Management based on SOL005 and SOL003
  • ETS Catalog DB support for NS, VNF and PNF

• Demo of Dublin VNFM Adapter from SDC to VNF
• Demo of SO-Monitoring with VNFM work as an example

Mateusz Pilat

Michal Ptacek

Introduction 

• architecture
• procedure

What has change since last DDF meeting

• introducing Integration tests
  
• Ansible installer for Cassablanca

Future plans for El-Alto and beyond

• establish community CI offline builds (including automated offline platform build)
• align offline installer with community life cycle
• challenges,  concerns 

Offline installer in Read the Docs: link

Sylvain Desbureaux

ONAP has identified a new ccordinator role to better interact with CNCF

Presentation of potential CNCF components that could be used for ONAP and potential impacts on ONAP architecture.

Discussion about CNF testbed and how we can re-use it

we will discuss SP priorities as brought to EUAG and requirements coming from ONAP member companies to set priorities and scope for Frankfurt Release

Jing Lu

Introduction Huawei open source team's effort in assuring code and docker security by apdoting open source tools in development, such as coverity and anchore.

Mike Elliott

Lucjan Bryndza

OOM Enhancements for El Alto and Frankfurt releases. Includes demo of ONAP Operations Manager Dashboard.

Community Updates

• Akraino Collaboration - SD-WAN Blueprints etc.

Progress on https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Automation+through+ONAP+Arch.+Task+Force+-+Distributed+Management+%28ONAP+etc.%29+components

• Plans for Frankfurt Releases
• Related presentations; OOM Enhancements (Mike Elliott), K8S Cloud Region  Support

Katsia Kazak

How ONAP is going to handle VNF Application Configuration? As ONAP is already introducing SOL003 and SOL005, it is worth introducing SOL002 as well. I will present work that Samsung has done as part of the internal demo + discussion about the future of Application LCM interfaces in ONAP.

This session is dedicated to review the ONAP requirements backlog foreseen for El-Alto.

Feel free to fill in pro-actively the following wiki page: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/El-Alto+Release+Requirements

Catherine Lefevre

Eric Multanen

Rajendra Mishra 

Virtual Radio Area Network (vRAN) is a critical piece for upcoming 5G networks. In this demo, we will show you how to build the FlexRAN (an open source vRAN approximation VNF from Intel), onboard it onto ONAP and then deploy it onto OpenStack. Once the service is deployed, the FlexRAN service performs basic operations in a simulated environment.

Liam Fallon merely submitted session proposal

James Forsyth

We will look at the AAI data model and some of the visualization tooling that is being developed around it.  We'll look at AAI custom queries that allow for easy traversals of the graph database, and touch on new features for even more flexible traversals slated for future releases.

Kenny Paul

This session would cover two experiences sharing topics, that is gathered in working at Policy Framework but can be applied anywhere:

1. Switching docker base image from ubuntu to apline, that would reduce footprint signicantly . 
2. Investigation result about upgrade Java 11 from Java 8, that is tricker than most upgrades. We have to face some challenges, like:
   some modules were removed or deprecated, we need to find the replacements; IDEs, plugins and tools also need to be updated; some new features are introduced, etc.

Meanwhile it would be also great to listen to your opinions.

Alpine Linux and upgrading to Java 11.mp4

Looking into security of the managed environment, this could be represented as a 3rd party application using ONAP.  The questions to explore are: how does a 3rd party application use ONAP? What are the options and approaches?

Eric Multanen

Bin Yang

Demonstrate use of the SO multicloud plugin adapter to instantantiate workloads via Multicloud – showing how HPA policies can be utilized and also deployment to Kubernetes cloud regions.  Discuss API, feature/functionality work items, integration, etc.

Chuanyu Chen

Sharing the demo of using ONAP to orchestrate SD-WAN and Edge. Will cover the following topics:

1.Share the scenario of SD-WAN & Edge

2.How we model it in ONAP SDC.

3.Closed loop;Band width on demand.

Yan Yang

OpenLab Subcommittee 

Open Lab Subcommittee meeting

1. Lab update  - invite lab owner to introduce the lab latest status

2. Disscuss how to better utilize lab resources and oversight lab utilization

3. OpenLab E/F work planing

Yan Yang

1.Introduce the implemented tosca parser microservice 

2. The E/F work planing

3. Requirements Collection

Yan Yang

@Chengli Wang

1.Introduce the VF-C work in Dublin

2.The VF-C commercial application from different vendor

3. The VF-C Requirements collection and discussion in E/F 

Sharing the experiences in developing CMCC NFV Orchestrator with ONAP,  some concerns/improvements/requirements about projects of ONAP

Demonstrate CMCC NFV Orchestrator, including package management, life cycle management. etc.

Enbo Wang

Present the work done about PNF software upgrade using Ansible, and propose the enhancement roadmap for El Alto/Frankfurt, such as:
1. SO workflow
2. Query and update A&AI
3. Northbound API
4. Ansible management API
5. etc.

Lingli Deng

Vimal Begwani

Stephen Terrill

Srinivasa Addepalli

This session is dedicated to solicitation and planning for network intelligence collaboration proposals with ONAP community.

Acumos_ONAP_Integration_Arch.pptx

Lingli Deng

This is a discussion session intended to host a dedicated discussion on implementation options on how to enable end-to-end 5G slicing as part of ONAP automated service provisioning/operation.  Gaps in contexts of different options will be discussed for corresponding planning. 

Sylvain Desbureaux Mike Elliott Brian Freeman

ONAP OOM Gating has been using Orange OpenLab platform for any new OOM patch. More than 500 ONAP deployments launched to validate OOM modification.

Lessons learnt and how to extend this process to other projects.

 Stephen Terrill

 Presentation and Discussion

During the dublin release, there were steps taken towards modularization.  This is to have a brainstorm to identify possible next steps

 Stephen Terrill

 A discussion to recieve input from the community about Architecture Topics to be prioritized heading for Release F (and beyond).

Eric Debeau Sylvain Desbureaux

Improve ONAP tests and verify that every pod is using in one or more end-to-end use-case or test cases.

Improve use-case documentation to explain the list of components used per use-case (by use-case owner)

Detail for each use-case the list of pods involved for every use-case (by PTL)

Remove use-case code/artifcats from the ONAP components code and create dedicated repos for the use-case gathering all the artifacts to be used for a use-case

Sylvain Desbureaux

Improve ONAP versioning process

Lincoln Lavoie  (remote)

Heather Kirksey

Jim Baker

 Chuyi Guo

 Work out release E/F TOSCA VNF Compliance and Validation requirements, including VNF package format and VNF test cases. If  you have proposals, please upload https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/LN/TOSCA+VNF+Compliance+and+Validation+Requirements+Proposal+for+R5

ONAP TOSCA VNF working session discussion.pdf

Summary of ONAP code base pentest. Sharing lessons learnt and discussing approaches for vulnerability prevention.

No Kubernetes cluster should stay vulnerable. Easiest way of ensuring that is to use an automated assessment tool. Session will cover current approaches for this task as well as gather ONAP requirements for such utility.

Not all ONAP container images keep the binary content idempotent. In several cases additional runtime dependencies are downloaded after container starts. Consequences and possible solutions will be discussed during this session.

Rex Lee

Pawel Pawlak

Amy Zwarico

The goal of this session is to present ONAP SECCOM Scope of Work proposal and discuss with stakeholders feasibility, time line and responsibilities for:

• relevant updates - version management (Kubernets, Docker, Python, Ubuntu, Alpine, Java etc.)
• known vulnerabilities - repositories updates

Pawel Pawlak

This session would provide better understanding of documented process and sharing with the LFN community lessons learned.

Pawel Pawlak

Tony Hansen

Amy Zwarico

Review of the process with special focus on the achievements and pending points in the context of ONAP.

Pawel Pawlak

Amy Zwarico

Samuli Kuusela

Paul-Ionut Vaduva

@Cristina Pauna

A new proposal to use dockerhub's own docker registry for storing the Ci/CD/daily docker images builds as opposed to other implementations. Discussions around reliability, outreach of the registry, speed of new feature adoptions (like multi-architecture support) and daily performance.

The presentation will have three parts:

1. A brief introduction to dockerhub.
2. How dockerhub is used on LF projects CI/CD pipelines
3. ONAP use-case. How dockerhub public registry can benefit ONAP CI/CD build pipeline, what are the challenges, what are the tech teams requirements, proposed migration plan, and stakeholders, expressed and addressed concerns so far

After the presentation we would like to initiate Q/A and expression of other concerns not addressed so far, to be addressed or to be made known to us so we can addressed them in subsequent refinements of this proposal.

• Where to add the code in Gerrit
• What else needs to be updated in order to make the new plugin available in the controller container
• How to test the change locally

 Magnus Buhrgard 

Network Management community coordination

Presentation of proposed WoW

Soliciting ideas and discussing plans for coordination with 3GPP SA5, ETSI NFV, ETSI ZSM, IETF, BBF, MEF, TMF in the area of network management.

 Stephen Terrill

 Colect any issues for Architecture Release E to be considered. 

Parker Berberian

We will have a short presentation on what Lab as a Service is, where we are today, and how we plan to proceed. We want to have time to discuss the LaaS project proposal with the community and answer any questions.

The LaaS team is not able to attend, so this will have to be a remote session.

Brian Freeman

Hampus Tjäder

With the introduction of mTLS for the Dublin release, there have been troubles with proper certificate handling with external CA support and secure key storage. As a result, some ONAP projects ended up using manually configured certificates.
A centralized solution for certificate handling, secure storage and KMS that ONAP projects easily can integrate with is important for future release. Focus will be on external interfaces.

It would be good for the community to get clear guidelines from SECCOM which solution we will target in long term and for Frankfurt. In this session there will be multiple presenters. First topic will be regarding background from Dublin and the need to introduce CMPv2 with  welcomed discussion regarding how this might be done.

Second presentation will be held by AAF PTL related to the current plans and solution in AAF regarding certicate handling and secure key storage. 
Third presentation will be held by Intel regarding their investigation and PoC for ISTIO CA private key secure storage using softhsmv2.

Reverse engineering of data models -- how and why

Many ONAP components have developed their own data models independently to fill their own needs. As the complexity of ONAP increases, there is a need not only to document these data models, but also to compare them, find commonalities,  create abstractions, and define common principles. One path to this is through reverse-engineering.

This session will present different considerations and techniques when reverse-engineering data models to a common notation, looking at specific examples. The intention is to start a discussion around the needs in the community and how to best fulfil them.

 James Cuddy

David Farrelly

Michela Bevilacqua

Hello World Closed Loop (CDS and Policy aka APEX integration)

 A PoC has been progressed to explore CDS integration with APEX for a PNF closed loop. 

This activity has brought up interesting questions, possible requirements and next step proposals for further architectural exploration in the  area of policy framework and CLAMP. We are happy to share it in the comunity to open a discussion.

Oskar Malm

For R6 it is proposed to extend LCM support in ONAP components as enabler for use cases such as PNF SW upgrade:

• General improvements to PNF support
• Introduce the CDS blueprint processor as option in the controller layer for handling of LCM actions

This session will look at bit closer at the problems and project impact

Samuli Kuusela
Timo Perala

A top-down approach for xNF license management and ONAP: proposal with a few license management principles, and some existing use cases with license management aspects included.

Katsia Kazak

Small rant about state of things in ONAP from a "new" developer perspective.

Ciaran Johnston

Continuing on from the presentation / discussion in San Jose in April, taking Policy Framework as an example for defining model-driven ONAP architecture

Stephen Terrill

Stephen Terrill

Adolfo Perez-Duran

ONAP uses a number of different container base images and different versions of the same base images: 5 different versions of node, 9 different versions of openjdk and 13 different versions of Python across ONAP projects. This approach has led to duplication of efforts and inefficiencies, such as resource consumption, large footprint and long build times. Also, teams experience unnecessary pain when unexpected changes occur in upstream projects.

What if we adopted three best practices to tackle these issues together and increase re-usability, stability and security.

First, to exploit cross-project commonalities and increase re-usability, adopt a set of common base images, (onap/base-xxx) with a well-defined life cycle controlled by PTLs.

Second, to guarantee stability, setup a mirror of the Alpine Linux distribution that's locked during development cycles. Base images and libraries will remain stable during each development cycle and will only be updated in-between development cycles.

Third, let the security sub-committee proactively participate in the vetting of the OS distribution and base image in order to address any security concern before a development cycle starts.

Magnus Buhrgard Timo Perala

Open discussion on the opportunities and hurdles for open source code in the Telecom industry

Bin Hu
Catherine Lefevre

Heather Kirksey

user-20f1f

Manoj Nair

Related to the API GW Proposal being discussed in the Architecture committee - Discussion on the problems, functional capability, project alignment and technology (Service Mesh, API GW Solution, K8S API Aggregation etc) . Seek guidance from ArchComm on next steps

Vamsi Bodepudi

 Vijay Venkatesh Kumar

  (remote)

 Onsite support - David Farrelly James Cuddy

DCAE Dublin features highlights/demo & future release focus

Recording : DCAE_DDF_Session_06122019.mp4

Amar Kapadia

Heather Kirksey Lincoln Lavoie Jim Baker

Rabi Abdel

Introduction to OVP. This session will set up the business drivers and high level expectations of OVP. For those that have not been involved in OVP work to date, this will be a good set up for working sessions later in the week.

Demo of BBS (Broadband Service) use case, status in Dublin, technical debt for future releases

Sandeep Sharma

Brief description of the ONAP interop activities at the 4th ETSI NFV Plugtests held from June 3-7, 2019. We will also cover our learnings.

Demo of a prototype GUI around OOM to simplify installation of ONAP