Meeting Minutes:
Children Display |
---|
Session Access
The zoom links are in Team Up calendar link that is located at 2022 LFN DTF Workshop April link.
Topics
Day 1 | Time | Topic | Facilitator | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
05:00-5:15 AM PST 12:00 - 12:15 UTC | Welcome & Logistics | Zoom bridge info is in the Team Up ScheduleDay 1 Top Level:
| ||
5:15-6:30 AM PST 12:15 - 13:30 UTC | CNF Vendor Input Focus: |
| ||
6:30-6:45 AM PST 13:30 - 13:45 UTC | Break 1 | |||
6:45-8:00 AM PST 13:45 - 15:00 UTC | Moving Forward: Program framework, targeted projects and next step | Olivier Smith |
| |
8:00-8:15 AM PST 15:00 - 15:15 UTC | Break 2 | |||
8:15-9:30 AM PST 15:15 - 16:30 UTC | Moving Forward: Deep Dive on Interop Challenges | Scot Steele | Deep Dive: Interoperability Challenges
| |
9:30 AM PST 16:30 UTC | Day 1 Ends | |||
Day 2 | Time | Topic | Facilitator | Comments |
05:00-5:15 AM PST 12:00 - 12:15 UTC | Welcome & Logistics | |||
5:15-6:30 AM PST 12:15 - 13:30 UTC | Orchestration: EMCO and ONAP On-boarding and use case alignment |
| ||
6:30-6:45 AM PST 13:30 - 13:45 UTC | Break 1 | |||
6:45-8:00 AM PST 13:45 - 15:00 UTC | Orchestration: EMCO and ONAP ongoing operations alignment | Ranny Haiby |
| |
8:00-8:15 AM PST 15:00 - 15:15 UTC | Break 2 | |||
8:15-9:30 AM PST 15:15 - 16:30 UTC | LFN Community Support Workshop: Common Documentation and Tooling |
| ||
9:30 AM PST 16:30 UTC | Day 2 Ends |
Topics
HRK: I'm showing my thought process work here. It's anything resembling a schedule by any stretch of the imagination, and the deep dives into issues and specific questions reflect only my own curiosity and what troubles me. This is merely a starting point, and I hope that the Programming Committee does what it will. We also need to build in time to get to some planning and outcomes.....
CNF Topics
- Taking Anuket RA and RC activities into workloads
- Is it sufficient to come up with a basic framework to demonstrate functionality on an example RI?
- Necessary – is it sufficient?!
- Tortured metaphor: we've got a good foundation, but need to address plumbing, HVAC, walls, and flooring
- Where does performance come in?
- How do we get into more challenging interop?
- CNI
- Other networking frameworks (eg., Istio, Envoy)?
- Networking abstraction – how do we push this past the goal line, publish, and test?
- Data Plane
- If performance tuning is a source of interop issues, how do we address these?
- Are data plane issues as opaque to workloads as claimed (should we do a survey, or testing experiment to have non-anecdotal data)?
- If this is too much work, what is the highest priority activity that will reduce the cost due to re-work for end users, platform vendors, workload (CNF) vendors?
- How do we avoid the mistakes of the past? Let's at least avoid those and create new ones.
- Is it sufficient to come up with a basic framework to demonstrate functionality on an example RI?
- Given the previous topic, what is the highest priority testing a badging program and enforce and provide?
- CNF vendor input summit
- How do we ask better questions to the CNF vendor community?
- Bring as many CNF providers as possible (perhaps with a bit of pre-prepared questions)
- Vendors who have deployed within the 5GSPB context
- Magma
- O-RAN SC implementations and vendors
- OAI
- Workload BUs rather than platform BUs in our NEP members
- Active CNF vendors (e.g. Matrixx, Affirmed, Metaswitch)
- LF Edge application requirements
- What guidelines, testing, information would be helpful for them such that they don't have to re-do for each platform/end user
- Are we talking how to give guidelines and test for them against the platform requirements, or are there specific testing regimes for applications?
- Assumption: CNF to specific platform 1:1 as a deployment requirement does not and cannot scale.
...
Day 1 – CNF Vendor Input Summit – I think that this is a full day (4 hour) topic
- 10 minute Intro and Logistics review
- Part 1: As a follow up to the January Workshop, several consecutive focused sessions with CNF vendors to gain an understanding of what requirements they need from LFN projects and community to support their workloads and applications. Need to look at the expectations from the onboarding/orchestration, on-going supportability and infra platform perspectives
- What are the vendors' priorities, objectives and expected outcomes? Improved time to market? Ability to use a reference architecture to cut development time? Something else?
- What architectures, requirements, guidelines, and test frameworks or information are needed to achieve these objectives? Are we talking how to give guidelines and test for them against the platform requirements, or are there specific testing regimes for applications?
- Projects of most interest to the CNF/Operator communities?
- Magma
- O-RAN SC implementations and vendors
- OAI
- Workload BUs rather than platform BUs in our NEP members
- Active CNF vendors (e.g. Matrixx, Affirmed, Metaswitch)
- LF Edge application requirements
- Part 2: Once the objectives have been identified, develop guidance from CNF vendors on program framework, targeted projects and next steps
- Map out an Infra Platform and Compliance Framework
- Orchestration requirements and framework
- How to map Anuket RA and RC activities to support CNF workloads
- Is it sufficient to come up with a basic framework to demonstrate functionality on an example RI?
- Do a discrete set the CNF compliance/platform interop requirements need to be fed directly into Anuket project workstreams
...
- EMCO/ONAP Architecture alignment Deep DiveDive – 3 hours
- Part 1:
- On-boarding: Alignment across ONAP and EMCO, taking into account the role played by k8s.
- Assumption for ingress: Helm v3
- Needs to be jointly defined first, then determine if and where it belongs upstream.
- Is there a connection to Anuket and Anuket Assured program? Infrastructure→Applications>Onboarding>MANO>Infrastructure (end-to-end)
- Part 2: Appropriate use cases for EMCO and ONAP, when to use them separately and or together
- Part 3: Post-onboarding – Day N – onboarding activities and requirements as products move into production – Day 2 – where and how are ongoing metrics collected and how to they feed into relevant parts of the stack....
- What is considered in or out of the stack in various architectures....
- Interoperability Challenges – Is this separate Part 4: CNF Interoperability Challenges between workload/platform and orchestrator/workload
- CNI – is this the only answer?
- Other networking frameworks (eg., Istio, Envoy)?
- Networking abstraction – how do we push this past the goal line, publish, and test?
- Data Plane
- If performance tuning is a source of interop issues, how do we address these?
- Are data plane issues as opaque to workloads as claimed (should we do a survey, or testing experiment to have non-anecdotal data)?
Day 2 – Second Half
- Topics Topics of interest to the general communitycommunity – 1 hour
- Common documentation standardized guidelines – Minimum requirements and expectations, tools, types of documentation required for different types of projects.
- Common tooling – What is the current set of tools? Is there a possibility for consolidation? Is it needed? Is this even possible?
Logistics
- 2 15 minute breaks (instead of 1 30 minute one.
- No summary needed
- Very short intro at the beginning of each day (10 minutes by Heather or someone who is more awake)
Facilitation Ground Rules
- Each Session should have a clearly defined objective and scope statement.
- When offering your thoughts, please be concise. We ask you avoid monopolizing the conversation.
- When someone is speaking, please allow them to complete their thoughts.
- While debate is an underpinning of growth, decorum is the foundation of progress.
- The Facilitator/Presenter and Moderator will work to keep the discussion aligned with objectives and scope. Discussions that are not in alignment with objectives and scope will be deferred.
- The Moderator will record the deferred topics in a topic “Parking Lot” to be addressed by assignment to community representatives at the conclusion of the session.
- Each session should be served by a scribe