Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

MemberRepresenting
MemberRepresenting
MemberRepresenting
ODIM (sandbox)
FD.io (TAC)xOrangex
Anuket (TAC)

@Eyal Felstaine

Amdocs
Nokiax

@Anil Guntupalli 

Verizon
CiscoxTF (incubation)

@Anil Kapur 

Juniper

IBM

xGoogle
AT&TPHuawei
Samsungx
ONAP (TAC)PChina Mobile
ODL (TAC)x
ZTE
Deutsche TelekomxIntel
Ericsson
Walmart
Red Hat
Tech Mahindra
OPX (sandbox)
China Telecom






XGVela (sandbox)

LF Staff: Casey Cain LJ Illuzzi Casey Cain  Kenny Paul Heather Kirksey

Others:   Walter Kozlowski

Agenda

Minutes

Topic 1

  • Comments

Topic 2

  • Comments

Action items

  •  

Misc

  • Al Morton introduced Walter Kozlowski and informed the TAC that he would be representing the Anuket community going forward.

Developer Survey Update

  • 57 respondents out of the 350ish registered attendees
  • Request that the community leadership encourage participation in the LFN Operational Survey
  • 2020 survey had 87 responses, so YoY we are down in response rates
  • Ed Warnicke LFN Operational Survey (deadline May 7)? Yes. FD.io community does not respond to an email request
    • LFN to send request to community leaders and asking them to perform the reachout to the respective communities
  • Frank Brockners Is there a way to add an incentive? Swag give away?
    • International shipping is beyond affordable - perhaps other digital awards are possible (store credit, event passes, etc.)

Regular Updates

Feedback on LFN IT Services

  • Objective: Improve relations between communities and LF IT
  • Some structural problems remain
  • ONAP Jenkins downtime reviewed 
    • Each outage resulted in a close of a LF IT ticket and a re-open of the ticket on failure
  • Community members are not given credentials/authorization to self-manage the tools
  • Community does not review the code from LF IT
    • Has introduced regressions 
  • System upgrades
    • Deferred updates cause longer outages for community developers
  • No full 24x7 support from LF IT - full community support could address this
  • Proposed changes
    • Share credentials with communities via TSCs
    • More time zone support
    • Open source alternatives for all LF IT services
  • Discussion
    • Ed Warnicke Don't use LF IT as primary provider. CNCF does not provide tool chains for projects
    • Jason Hunt Clearly ties into the Operations Survey - this requires more discussions
    • Heather Kirksey These issues underscore the reasons of LF IT engaging tool chains like gitlab
  • View file
    nameTAC_30_06.pdf
    height150

Developer and Testing Forum

  • Next event for Q4 planning
    • ONE Summit is a hybrid event as pandemic is still a global issue
      • Are NOT planning on the usual approach of coupling a 2 day event with the ONE Summit as Kubecon is adjacent
    • Does the community want another DTF event in 2021?
      • Ranny Haiby ONAP had diminishing number of topic proposals in the June event - perhaps this suggests virtual event fatigue - 
      • Ed Warnicke Need to take a break
      • Walter Kozlowski Beginning of 2022 would be OK for the Anuket community
      • Timo Perala Projects are free to host their own events
    • #AGREED: NO additional Virtual event in 2021
  • Q1 2022 event
    • What is the sentiment for a Q1 2022 hybrid/in-person event
      • Anuket was not in favor of an in person event
      • ONAP has not expressed a strong opinion
        • Jason Hunt Remain optimistic that travel could open up
        • Kenny Paul to re-ask the ONAP TSC  
    • LFN default is NO live event until the community enthusiastically supports it
      • Perhaps a smaller, community sponsored event
      • Window for Jan 2022 reservations is closing
    • CONCLUSION: While in-person events are important, the health of the community is more important. Defer in-person event after Q1 2022