Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: more member vs guest corrections

...

Members: Atul Purohit David Perez Caparros   Rabi Abdel @ramesh   Ryan Hallahan  Shiby Parayil Trevor Cooper Vincent Scharf Brian Freeman Guy Meador Marc-Alexandre Choquette

Guests: Catherine Lefevre Saad Ullah Sheikh Lincoln Lavoie LIN MENG @ramesh,  Shiby Parayil  Trevor Cooper Vincent Scharf 

LF staff: Jim Baker user-20f1f Heather Kirksey Kenny Paul Alan Blackburn 

EUAG Working Group proposal 2   

Atul Purohit  shared the slides  

View file
nameEUAG 2.0 Engagement Model.pptx
height250

None of the current attendees were a part of the original formation of the EUAG!

...

  • CSPs are to complete the 3 worksheets for review by 2019-05-07
  • We'll review the CSP inputs in the next EUAG meeting
  • At the 2019-05-21 meeting, we'll review the normalized view

View file
nameTemplate For PoCs.pptx
height250

View file
nameTemplate For Top 3 Priorities.pptx
height250

view-file
nameTemplate For State of Play.pptx
height250

OVP value proposition/MVP review 

...

Looking to finalize by end of April - will provide a final recap of the MVP by next meeting


Chat Log

07:30:44 From Catherine Lefevre : i can not speak - here is catherine
07:30:59 From Catherine Lefevre : 32475 77 36 73
07:32:30 From Catherine Lefevre : thanks I will disconnect since i was only attending to the first part as ONAP TSC :-)
07:32:36 From Catherine Lefevre : have a nice day
07:42:07 From Brian : onap doesnt provide a Openstack - wording issue
07:43:27 From Heather Kirksey : Brian, we were under the impression that ONAP does ship w/ a vanilla OpenStack. If that's not the case, that's a great point to bring up. Thx
07:44:54 From Marc-Alexandre Choquette (Bell Canada) : you could swap ‘provided’ by ‘supported’.
07:45:51 From Brian : 'supported' would be much better
07:46:13 From SAAD SHEIKH <STC> : Do we have a plan to output some specifications that can support us during RFP bcz from OPNFV OVP also we find challenge for this point
07:51:15 From LinMeng : how does the requirements& deliverables designed? why the test only focus on HEAT based VNFs?
07:53:58 From Lincoln Lavoie (UNH-IOL) : @LinMeng, the focus on HEAT is largely based on the relationship to the timing. TOSCA would likely require additional work on requirements and test tooling. So, the value question is, Does HEAT in the E-release timing create the first level of value, or does it need to include TOSCA and push the timing out to create the value
07:55:43 From LinMeng : thanks
07:56:45 From Heather Kirksey : And LinMeng, that is one of the questions we wanted to ask all of you here?
08:03:04 From Lincoln Lavoie (UNH-IOL) : VNF Validation Minimum Viable Product
08:03:32 From LinMeng : I will confirm and provide the feedback . I think we have the requirements for the testing of TOSCA based VNFs