Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Topic Leader(s)

Topic Overview

Excerpt


EUAG working updates, what CSPs concerns this year and what we've achieved, including AI/ML, CSPs requirements priorities, automated testing white paper, etc. We will have three sub-topics in this session. This session will be a review of Operators' concerns this year and what we've achieved, including AI/ML, CSPs requirements priorities, automated testing white paper, etc. We will have three sub-topics in this session:  EUAG Networking AI/ML Survey and Next Steps, EUAG Input from LFN Projects to set Priorities, EUAG Networking AI/ML Testing Requirements, NFV testing white paper, Anuket verification program vs. LFN level branding (nee: OVP)

...

View file
nameEUAG Newly Updates_- Voices from Cross-Community End Users_v2.pdf
height250

EUAG-AI&ML_survey_results-2021-02-01.mp4

...

 Lei Huangnotes that maybe would gather requirements from the Operators, then look for a third party to be used for open lab testing.  OVP testing potential?  potential Morgan Richomme Very limited in scope.  Morgan Richommesays we   We need to work on the testing/certification process.  As a service provider, the certification cannot be too lightweight.  The certification adds value only if it reduces the operators' effort to bring a given service/product into production.  Badges need a static definition, while testing frameworks are living products that are more able to change to meet the changes in technology.  The static definition of the RFP process has to be balanced with the rapid changes in the technology.  Operators have this problem with the long time frames between the original RFP and the final execution.  

...