Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Cedric
    • RC-1/2 should be used in production environments and hence not execute destructive testing
    • the Yardstick framework is hard to maintain → questionable if we want to re-active it
  • key question: is resilience testing in the scope of RC-1/2
    • CNTT specifies requirements on resilience → there is a need for validating such requirements via an automated test
    • → we likely need such tests and then need to de-/select destructive tests depending on use case: workload onboarding (non-destructive) vs. OVP badging (destructive)
  • Need to distinguish between HA and resiliency. A resilient system continues to function in case of a failure (we can limit to a single failure scenario)
  • In a cloud environment one expects infrastructure failures and thus expect resiliency and HA  from the software systems (OSTK, etc.) – # of deployments, etc.
  • Recovery also needs to be taken into account.  If the recovery impacts the workloads to the point where they are no longer functional, then it cannot be considered resilient 
  • RA1 Chapters 3 and 4 specify the services, # of minimum deployments, etc. to meet the requirements specified in Chapter 2; also review Ch5 (Thanks, Cedric)
  • Opened CNTT Issue #2061 to make the network resiliency requirement more specific

...