...
- Choose "Meld" TSC size (15?) - Decision? 15 members?
- Allocate 8 seats to one group and 7 to the other
- As close to half and half as possible
- Flip a coin to determine which one is slightly larger?
- Election timeline?
- Quorum Requirement
- Change the voting criteria - a 2/3 majority?
- Determine a process to fill those allocated seats. I see two options:
- Each TSC votes amongst its existing members to determine who serves on the "Meld" TSC
- Each community runs a vote according to its existing procedures to fill its seats from the existing TSC members
- Note that one community could go one path the other could go the other
- Also note that it's possible that not every existing TSC member may want to serve on the "Meld" TSC as its responsibilities may be different than steady state – one first step could be to assess interest and volunteers
- Decision?: Each Existing TSC Plus CNTT Gov will vote among themselves for the MELD interim TSC membership?
- It may be possible to shorten the election cycle compared to the full annual election
- Decide the term of the "Meld" TSC
- Long enough to effect the full merge
- Finite
- Ideally aligned with steady state annual election cycle
- Suggestion: When Steady state annual election (Aug-Sept.)but no later than
TSC Composition – Long-term/Steady State
...
- Size
- Roles, responsibilities, desired skillsets
- Eligibility (Fair, quantifiable, transparent) – may be that this is a topic for the Tech Ops group?
- Composition (Are all seats generally elected seats?)
- Officers (currently a chair and vice chair for OPNFV, single chair for CNTT) Scott Steinbrueck and Walter Kozlowski are CNTT TSC co-chairs, are they not?
External Relationships (LFN Projects and External)
...