Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • General requirements
    • the portal must at least provide the same functionality as today's portals (see https://nfvi-verified.lfnetworking.org/#/):
    • high-level use cases "marketplace": list companies and products which have obtained a badge
      1. upload, validate, display and manage test results by "uploaders"
      2. review test results by "reviewers"
      3. list companies and products which have obtained a badge in a "marketplace"


  • Integration of different OVP programsOVP program integration
    • the web portal must integrate different types of OVP programs (e.g. NVFI, VNF, ...)
    • today, the VNF and NFVI program use separate web portals basically providing the same functionality, only differing in the validation of test results.


  • user roles
    • "uploader"
      • can upload and manage test results
      • can only see own test results
    • "reviewer"
      • can see all test results marked as "for review" by its "uploader"
    • "admin"
      • can manage user roles
      • can manage (create, update, delete) entries to the marketplace


  • test result management
    • authenticated users (role "uploader") must be able to
      • upload test results
      • edit meta data of a test result set (product name, etc.)
      • view and edit only their own test results
      • change status of a test result between "private" and "for review"


  • review management
    • authenticated reviewers (user role) must be able to
      • access all test results set to state "for review"
      • cast a vote (-1, 0, 1) on every instance of test results


  • OVP release management
    • management of releases of OVP (create new, edit, delete) must be runtime operations, i.e., not requiring new versions of the portal
    • a OVP release comprises
      • documentation
      • a unique test result schema for test result validation and display


  • validation and display of test results (see also terminology below)
    • the web portal must validate that an uploaded set of test results conforms to a given format (schema)
    • validation of test results must follow a schema (manageable as part of the release management)
    • the schema shall include
    • by comparing the "test result summary" to a "test result guideline"list of all tests per OVP release: "source of truth" - does an uploaded test result package contain results for all tests of an OVP release
      • "test result guideline": source of truth
        • list of all test cases which are part of a given OVP release
          • use case: detect if test cases are missing from uploaded test results
        • the expected result for passing each test case (functional tests: "pass", non-functional: "value")
        • stored in web portal only
      • "test result summary"
        • part of the "test result package" generated by test tool
        • json formatted
        • should include in addition to today (AP on test tooling team)
          • OVP release ID (e.g. 2020.10)
          • OVP program type (e.g. NVFI, VNF, ...)
    review management
    • optional requirements, requires close collaboration with and input from test tooling team
      • define a schema for formal validation of test result summary
      • define a schema for formal validation of test result guide
    • reviewers (user role) must be able to
    • access all test results set to state "for review"
    • cast a vote (-1, 0, 1) on every instance of test results


  • portal lifecycle management
    • all management operations on test results, market place entries, users, and new releases of OVP must be runtime operations not requiring new builds of the web portal
    • separation of LCM of the portal instance (responsibility of LF IT) and content (responsibility of OVP admins)

...

  • user management
    • allow for managing users and roles based on LF IDs
    • roles: reviewer, uploader, admin


  • Terminology
    • "test result package": archive containing "test result summary" file and individual logs
    • "test result summary": json formatted file containing a summary of all test cases / one run of the compliance test tool
    • "test result guideline": json formatted file containing all tests which are part of an OVP release + expected result for passing a test


...


Requirements (as noted during the call on :

...