Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TrackKey PointsChallengesNext Steps / AIs
LF StaffBe respectful of everyone's time
  • Presenters not on the bridge
  • Extended debates 
  • Presenters not concluding on time
  • Please be connected to the bridge 10 mins before schedule
  • Please request follow-up discussions
  • Please stick to your scheduled timeslot 
Testing


CNTT


OPNFV


ONAP

Change Management support














Presented what is done in Frankfurt and what is planned in Guilin












Build and Replace worklfow schould allow to modufy existing instances of the VNFs on the fly.

Lack of VNFC level reconfiguration is one if the missing features on SO/Controller side which is not suppoirted today. We want to solve this issue in the Guilin release

PNF support by ONAP Change Management is the key challenge, planned to extend in Guilin

Schema/VSP Update is a chalange in the Upgrade process in ONAP. We want to addres this issue and to enable update of the schema with adequate modification of the existing instnces of services - for PNFs, VNFs and CNFs

Integration with CDS and K8s workloads as one of the key drivers for improvements of change management porocess in ONAP as K8s provides scaling, upgrades and traffic distribution capabilities by itself. For Frankfurt integration with CDS for CNFs creation is introduces. IN further releases K8s scaling and upgrade capabilities should be introduced.


Transport slicing support by ONAP

One possible implementation is presented by Huawei

IETF work to define it has started, but it is draft only

Work which has been done is presented

Get it as a requirement for Guilin Release and then get several ONAP implementation proposals and decide
Network slicing (core network) ongoing support by ONAP

CSMF and NSMF part of ONAP. External NSSMF to be used.

Demo for Frankfurt:

  • Transport subnet not in scope
  • Simulator RAN and core NSSMF simulator


Challenges on whether this is the only possible implementation or there may be more

Alignment on API  with 3GPP and  ORAN A1

Discussion on communication-service-profile introduced in ONAP

Warning on  templates that are deprecated within 3GPP

Impacts

  • No evolution in SDC
  • New WF for SO and NSSMFAdaptor
  • OOF used for NSI selection
  • &AI impact to include new 3GPP concepts (service profile, slice profile...)
  • 2 new portals: CSMF and NSMF (under UUI project)
SECCOM: Password removalAll passwords should be stored only in Kubernetes secrets, users should be allowed to provide their own secrets for the deployment and allow to generate passwords at the deployment time.Further exchanges with ONAP community on best practice approval and implementation - sessions at the PTLs and TSCs calls.
SECCOM: Ingress controller 

Ingress Controller introduced for Frankfurt as an option deployment

Effort on passing knowledge to ONAP teams on ingress controller and service mesh

Sessions at the PTLs calls.
ONAP SECCOM ISTIO opportunity for common continuation discussion   Coexistance of AAF and Service Mesh in a long term security solution AAF and ISTIO to be treated as two separate tracks
 Use Case Cross-Carrier 5G 

 Get the Community Aligned on Slicing - AP for Architecture/Requirements subcommittee + Magnus (ONAP TCC)

What are the "baby steps" to build a "Slicing" roadmap

Promote ONAP through #1 use cases that does not require changes in ONAP; #2 POC so Innovation can continue while focus on ONAP Core. 

...