...
Organizer or Presenter(s) | Session Title | Tracks (Please chose one from the list above) | Session Type (e.g. discussion, hacking, office hour, presentation, etc.) | Short Description | Target Audience
| Anticipated Attendance <15 15-25 25-50 >50 | Requested Duration | Requested Day | Interest List | HW resource plan/requirement |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBD | Nokia Welcome | Keynote | presentation | Host Welcome to the Community | Any | >50 | 25 mins | Tuesday | ||
TBD | Orange Welcome | Keynote | presentation | Co-Host Welcome to the Community | Any | >50 | 25 mins | Tuesday | ||
Nokia Lunch Demo | Any | Wednesday | ||||||||
Nokia Lunch Demo | Any | Thursday | ||||||||
ONAP TSC Members | ONAP TSC MEETING | ONAP Committee/Team Mtg | discussion | Regular TSC mtg | Any | >50 | 2 hrs | Thursday, 14:00 UTC | ||
OPNFV TSC Members | OPNFV TSC Meeting | OPNFV Committee/Team Mtg | discussion | Regular TSC mtg | Any | 15-25 | 1 hr | Tuesday, 14:00 UTC | ||
OPNFV Gambia Retrospective | Best Practices | presentation / discussion | Review Gambia release and identify areas for improvement | Any | 25-50 | 2 hrs | Wednesday | |||
DCAE-PNDA Integration; Overview, Status and next Steps | presentation, demo, discussion | Overview of the PNDA-DCAE integration - that became available with Casablanca. Discussion of current status and evolution of the integration | Any | 20-30 | 1.5hrs | Tuesday/Wednesday | ||||
Intern Lightning Talks | Process & Community | presentation | Each intern will do a 10 minute lightning talk about their project, followed by 3 minutes of questions.
| Any | 15-25 | 2 hour | Friday morning | |||
LFN documentation | Work session | 3 hours | ||||||||
ONAP documentation | Dublin release Align release scope for docs, agree on overall release milestones for docs | Work session | 1,5 hours | |||||||
OPNFV Testing Pain Points and Requirements | Infra and CI/CD | Discussion | Testing pain point and requirement discussion what attendees have. Some topics:
| Developers | 15-25 | 1 Hour | ||||
Doctor - Rolling Maintenance and Enhanced Fault Management Demo | Test | Presentation | I) Doctor maintenance use case demo using new OpenStack Fenix. ETSI defined, OPNFV Doctor refined, Implemented in OpenStack. II) Doctor enhanced fault management demo. Now many times faster. | Any | 25-50 | 1,5 Hour | ||||
Doctor - OpenStack Fenix BoF | Collab. Opportunities | Presentation Discussion | From Doctor maintenance requirements to OpenStack Fenix. Fenix project update and discussion | Any | 15-25 | 1 Hour | ||||
ONAP Edge Architecture & OPNFV Edge Efforts Collaboration | Edge, ONAP and also OPNFV | Presentation Discussion | ONAP Dublin deep dive Analytics as a Service - Dileep Ranganathan Srinivasa Addepalli ramki krishnan Big data analytics that include collection, analysis and closed loop actions are best performed closer to the data source. Analytics include infrastructure analytics, VNF specific analytics and application (including IOT-5G) centric analytics. One of the major challenges to enable analytics near data source is bringing up analytics framework at various cloud regions and then bringing up analytics applications on demand basis. This presentation discusses the method to automate steps involved in deploying analytics framework and analytics applications. This presentation details on
Keywords: PNDA, Analytics F-GPS - ramki krishnan, GUEYOUNG JUNG Dublin & Beyond - Distributed ONAP/3rd Party Management Application Architecture - Vimal Begwani ramki krishnan Srinivasa Addepalli @Mike Elliott
Dublin & Beyond - Managing MEC Apps with ONAP - Srinivasa Addepalli ONAP beyond Dublin & OPNFV OpenStack Edge Initiatives - R.Prakash R.Prakash | Any | 30-40 | 2.5 Hours | Wednesday or Thursday | |||
Functest on steroids | New features and opportunities Best practices CI/CD process | Presentation and Demo |
| Any | 15-25 | 1 hour | Any | |||
Functest 2019 | Best practices CI/CD process | Presentation |
| Any | 15-25 | 1 hour | Any | |||
Kubernetes based Cloud-region support in ONAP to bring up VM and container based VNFs/workloads | Cloud Native, ONAP | Presentation Discussion | Kubernetes is becoming a site orchestrator choice to deploy network functions and application workloads in cloud-regions. ONAP is being enhanced to bring up VNFs and workloads as VMs and containers in K8S based cloud-regions. This presentation details following:
| Any | 15-25 | 1 hour | Any | |||
David McBride | Daily Huddle | Community | Discussion | Gather input and document activity from each OPNFV session and organization. | All OPNFV plugfest participants | 25 - 50 | 1 hour | Tues, Weds, and Thurs | Emma Foley | |
David McBride | OPNFV Release Process Working Group - High Level Process Description (part I) | Best Practice | Discussion | Finalize high-level release process description. | OPNFV | < 15 | 1 hour | Tues | ||
David McBride | OPNFV Release Process Working Group - High Level Process Description (part 2) | Best Practice | Discussion | Finalize high-level release process description. | OPNFV | < 15 | 1 hour | Weds | ||
David McBride | OPNFV Release Process Working Group - Establish milestones | Best Practice | Discussion | Finalize high-level release process description. | OPNFV | < 15 | 1 hour | Thurs | ||
ONAP Control Loop Sub Committee | Committee/Team | Working | Collaborate on Dublin Priorities | ONAP | 15-25 | 2 hour | Wednesday | |||
Pamela Dragosh | ONAP Policy Framework | ONAP team | Presentation | Policy How To/Presentations/Demo | ONAP | 15-25 | 1 hour | Tuesday or Thursday | ||
VNF Test Tool For CVC – VNFSDK & VVP & Dovetail | Security & Compliance, Community | Discussion | Integrate VNF Test Tool(VNFSDK-VTP & VVP) Comes from ONAP with Dovetail/OVP Portal | OPNFV/ONAP | 15-25 | 1.5 hour | Any | |||
Kevin McDonnell | 5GTANGO V&V integration with ONAP. | Test | Presentation Discussion | Highlight the existing test platform , V&V, in 5GTANGO that works currently with OSM and discuss potential for collaborative testing with ONAP and VNFSDK/ VTP in particular. V&V will have the ability to invoke tests and publish results on ONAP Certified VNF Packaged | ONAP | 15-25 | 30 minutes | Tuesday or Wednesday | Weitao Gao | |
OVP - LFN verified program of OPNFV and ONAP | Security & Compliance | Presentation Demo Discussion |
| Any | 15-25 | 2 hours | Any | |||
Extending ONAP into Edge Computing Realm | Presentation and Demo | Presentation Demo Discussion | In ONAP R3 cycle, we have done some development and testing to extending ONAP into Edge Computing. | ONAP | 15-25 | 1 hour | Wednesday | |||
Data Collection and Analytics Engine (DCAE) - ONAP | ONAP Committee/Team Mtg | Presentation Discussion | Dublin Priorities & DCAE Deployment options (platform/services) | ONAP | 15-25 | 1hour | Any afternoon session | |||
Enabling HPA in ONAP R3 | ONAP | Presentation |
| ONAP | 20 - 35 | 30mins | Any | |||
Stephen Wong | OPNFV Clover: Utilizing cloud native technologies for NFV | Cloud Native | Presentation Demo |
| Any | 15-25 | 1 hour | Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday | ||
Brian Freeman (AT&T) | ONAP Use Case Development | ONAP Use Case/Best Practice | Presentation Discussion |
| ONAP | 20 | 1 hour | Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday | ||
ONAP Use Case -BBS | Best Practices/Use Case | Presentation Discussions |
| ONAP | 20 | 2 hour | Any | |||
Challenges in using ONAP and opportunities to improve | Best Practices | Presentation Discussion | Intel internal teams that use ONAP as users had good feedback and wanted to share same here
| |||||||
Edge Cloud Project/OVP/StarlingX | Edge Networking | Presentation Discussion |
| OPNFV Developers | 15 | 1 hour | Tuesday | |||
ONAP Housekeeping for Dublin | Process & Community | Presentation |
| ONAP | >5055 | 30 mins | Any | |||
Alla Goldner | ONAP Usecase subcommittee meeting | ONAP team | ONAP | >50 | 1.5 hours | Any | ||||
Use cases and functional requiremenbts - harmonization for Dublin release | ONAP team | Discussion with use cases/functional requirements owners | ONAP | 10-15 | 1 hour | Any | ||||
Compliance and Verification Programs | Collab. Opportunities | Discussion | Evolution and long term strategy planning for for the LFN compliance and verification programs. | CVC Committee Members Service Providers / End Users | 15-20 | 2 hours | Wednesday / Thursday | |||
Seshu Kumar Mudiganti | Service Orchestrator | ONAP team | Presentation Discussion | Service Orchestrator Dublin and beyond... | ONAP | 10 - 20 | 20 mins | Any | ||
Sriram Rupanagunta | Demonstrate the full life cycle of an L2 forwarder VNF using Yardstick NSB and ONAP | Best Practices/Use cases | Presentation |
| Implementers | 15-25 | 30 minutes | Tuesday/Wednesday | None | |
ONAP VNF Certification | Process & Community | Presentation, DIscussion | Proposed VNF Badges for Dublin Process to engage | VNF Providers | 15-25 | 30 min | Any (zoom) | Zoom room | ||
Jessica Wagantall & Bengt Thuree | LF Release Engineering Roadmap & Recommendations for ONAP | Infra/CICD | Presentation, Discussion | Discussion and reggestopon | TSC, PTLs | 25-50 | 1 hr | |||
Yan Yang | ONAP Experience from CMCC Lab | Best Practices/Use cases | Presentation Discussion | ONAP R3 Use Case in CMCC Lab | ONAP | 25~50 | 30 min | Tuesday | ||
Yan Yang | ONAP VF-C Dublin Planning | ONAP team | Presentation Discussion |
| ONAP | 25~50 | 30 min | Wednesday | Linda Horn | |
ONAP CCVPN Use Case | Use cases | Presentation Discussion |
| ONAP | 25~50 | 1 hour | Thursday | Margaret Chiosi | ||
ONAP CCVPN E-LAN Service Use Case (Dublin) | Use cases | Presentation Discussion |
| ONAP | 25~50 | 30 min | Thursday (linked to session above) | Zoom room | ||
(Remote presentation from China) | SP Requirements for ETSI NFV Alignment | Best Practices/Use cases Collab Opportunities | Presentation Discussion |
| ONAP & OPNFV | >50 | 30 min | Any | Margaret Chiosi | Zoom Room |
Generic TOSCA Parser For both Service Design and Run Time Orchestration | Collab Opportunities | Presentation Discussion |
| ONAP & OPNFV | 25~50 | 30 min | Any | Tal Liron | Zoom Room | |
VNF Benchmarking with OPNFV Yardstick NSB(Network Services Benchmark) | Presentation and Workshop |
| OPNFV | 10-20 | 30 min (Intro) + 60 min (LAB) | Any | Reliable Internet access | |||
Alex Xia Sriram Rupanagunta | Demonstrate the design and deployment of a Mobile Content Cloud (MCC) Network Service using ONAP | Best Practices/Use cases | Presentation and Recorded Demo |
| Implementers Users | 15-25 | 30 min | Tuesday/Wednesday | ||
OPNFV Edge Cloud Project/StarlingX/Edge Pharos Spec | Edge Networking/Collab. Opportunities | Presentation and Discussion |
| OPNFV | 10-20 | 30 min | Any except Tuesday | Margaret Chiosi | ||
Edge Cloud experience from CMCC lab | Edge Networking | Presentation and Discussion |
| Any | 10-20 | 30 min | Any except Tuesday | Margaret Chiosi | ||
ONAP multi-architecture container images | Best Practices/Use cases | Presentation and Discussion | In 2015 and early 2016 the Docker community created the v2.2 image specification with a new type—a manifest list—to represent a list of platforms (OS, CPU architecture, etc) and references to platform specific layers for different runtimes. In September 2017 Docker's Official Images became multi-platform. Running "run docker run hello-world" will pull and run the correct hello-world image whether you are using ARM, x86-64 Linux, Windows, IBM Z mainframes or any other system where Docker runs. Because ONAP is vendor-agnostic, multi-platform support in the container ecosystem brings capabilities the ONAP community has been waiting for a long time. The introduction of multi-architecture images will improve usability and deployability of ONAP containers across architectures and platforms. Developers no longer need workarounds such as adding an architecture-specific prefix to image names.
| Any | 15-25 | 1 hr | Any | Reliable Internet access | ||
Ciaran Murphy, Michael Morris, Byung-Woo Jun | SO Plug-In support VNFM using ETSI NFV SOL003 | ONAP team | Presentation Discussion | SO Adapter which uses ETSI NFV SOL003 to connect VNFM
| ONAP | 15 - 25 | 30 mins | Any | ||
PNF Pre-onboarding and PNF Onboarding Use Case, PNF package | ONAP Committee/ Team Mtg | Presentation and Discussion | PNF PreOnboarding and PNF Onboarding (delivery of PNF Onboarding package, NFSDK validation, SDC DS handling of the PNF Package, and PNFD to Platform Model) | Any | 15-25 | 30 min | Any | |||
Al Morton | OPNFV Test-WG face2face meeting | OPNFV Committee/ Team Mtg | Structured Discussion, possible presentations | Topic include Test API, Harmonization of Test tools (definition and goals), others. | Testers | 15 | 60 min | Thursday PM (will include remote access for participation) | Zoom room | |
Al Morton Sridhar Rao | VSPERF Long Duration Testing & Cross-NUMA Testing | OPNFV Committee/ Team Mtg + ETSI NFV TST WG (TST009 specification collaboration) | Structured Discussion, possible presentations | Tracking the effects of Transient Interrupts and dataplane impacts, and Measuring cost of cross-NUMA traffic to Dataplane performance. | Testers | 15 | two sessions, 30 min | Tuesday PM and Friday PM (will include remote access for participation) | Zoom room | |
Container-izing Test Tools | Test | Proposals and feedback session, with OPNFV VSPERF as an example. | As part of the evolution to cloud-native, test tools are migrating to implementation in containers. What are the best design choices that the community agrees on now? Best Practices? | Testers | 15 | 30 min | PM (will include remote access for participation) | Zoom room | ||
Linda Horn | Common FM and PM Meta Data Artifact for 5G | Best Practices / Use cases | Presentation | Format, content and usage of a common FM meta data artifact and PM Dictionary artifact for 5G NFs. | Any | 15-25 | 30 min | Any | Zoom room | |
(remote presentation from China, please help to assign a time slot in the morning in France time) | ONAP service information model | ONAP team | Presentation Disucssion |
| ONAP | 15-25 | 1 hour | Tuesday, or Wednesday | Marian Skorupa | Zoom |
Mark Scott | 3GPP Bulk PM Handling Use Cases | Best Practices/Use cases | Presentation | Overview | Any | 15-25 | 30 min | Any except Friday | Zoom room | |
Architecture - how to document our ONAP architecture | Collab. Opportunities Best practices/Use Cases | Discussion (with presentation) | There is a need to more deeply describe the ONAP architecture. Starting with what is there, not only from a component perspective but also on how it works through the variaous lifecycle steps. This session is to discuss this and the way forward | Architects | 25-50 | 2hrs | Wednesday or Thursday | |||
Dublin Architecture Requirements | Collab. Opportunities Best practices/Use Cases | Presentation with feedback | Updated presentation on the dublin architecture requirements | Architects | 25-50 | 30 mins | Wednesday or Thursday | |||
Stephen Terrill | ONAP Architecture Priorities | Collab. Opportunities Best practices/Use Cases | Discussion | Working discussion on the ONAP architecture prioritized topics | Architects | 25-50 | 30 mins | Wednesday or Thursday | ||
Stephen Terrill , others | Joint Architecture and modelling session | Collab. Opportunities Best practices/Use Cases | Discussion | Joint meeting to go into common architecture and modelling topics. Suggestion to focus on how to represent the NSD internally | Architects and modelling experts | 25-50 | 90 mins | Wednesday or Thursday | ||
Hui Deng , others | ONAP SDO coordinator report and invite SDO speech | Collab. Opportunities | Presentation with feedback | There were official SDO coordinator officer link here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/External+Standard+Coordination We will give a yearly report and invite one SDO speech during the session which is most influential | Architects and modelling experts | >50 | 40mins | Wednesday or Thursday | ||
ONAP Mini Summit PL 2018 Takeaways | Collab. Opportunities | Presentation with feedback from event's sessions | Summary of ONAP Mini Summit organized in November in Warsaw. We will share main outputs and takeaways from the event. | Any | 25-30 | 30 mins | Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday | Zoom room if possible | ||
Acceleration Management | Best practices/Use Cases | Presentation | As we know, HPA provides ONAP with capability of awareness of underlying hardware platform, and with that ONAP is able to leverage HPA features, such as DPDK and SR-IOV to locate and onboard VNFs on the right platforms for the purpose of performance mostly. However with maturity of ONAP and requirements of new VNFs, there exist some gaps inside the current HPA framework, for example, ambiguity tolerance in TOSCA templates and service assurance after VNF onboarding. Apart from the above, taking edge computing or 5G as an example, we're facing more and more new workloads and new scenarios, where high bandwidth and low latency are highly required in the requirements. For instance, those VNFs which do real-time analysis and diagnosis on surveillance video stream need accelerators like GPU and FPGA evidently to achieve the goals, and should consider and plan corresponding life-cycle management, hardware metrics monitoring, QoS, etc. for the accelerators. In the presentation, we're about to cover the following: - Gaps between the existing HPA framework and the new requirements on accelerators - Difference between HPA and acceleration management - Framework proposal to support acceleration management in ONAP - Changes to enhance ONAP and the HPA framework - Interoperability with Multi-Cloud and VIMs - Our plans | ONAP | 25-50 | 30 mins | Any morning session | Zoom room | ||
Introduction of Commercial NFVO Products | Real-World Deployments | Presentation | Any | >50 | 30 min | Any morning | Zoom room | |||
(remote presentation from China) | Network Service Model for Dublin Release | ONAP team | Presentation Disucssion | ONAP | 15-25 | 30 min | Any morning | Zoom room | ||
Marian Skorupa | Orange ONAP first real life operational implementation | Real-World Deployments | Presentation | Presentation of the lesson learned from I phase of GNOCe virtual robot implentation, ONAP PITEC, to monitor the quality of network management systems access in Poland, Slovakia, Belgium, Spain and Romania. This was possible thanks to the use of some of the capabilities of ONAP. In the first phase, ONAP is used to on-board and instantiate IPTEC probe VNFs, and to collect measurements results through VES collector and DMaaP. In a second phase, the use of ONAP should be extended to: - control loops development, - ONAP analytics integration, - PITEC re-configuration based on thresholds, - Integration with external ticketing system. | ONAP | 25 | 30 min | Any | ||
NBI enhancement, service modification & notifications | Collab. Opportunities | Discussion | Improving NBI TM Forum API for bss & oss means more integration with
Apis Objectives:
See | ONAP | 30 min | Wednesday | ||||
Airship integration in XCI | Collab. Opportunities | Discussion | Discuss the current status of integrating Airship in XCI and define the next steps. We are starting with openstack-helm and consecutively add more Airship components. | OPNFV | <15 | 1h | ||||
ONAP - pre and post instantiation configuration | Collab. Opportunities | Presentation Demo Discussion | Present the evolution of platform component: Service Orchestration & Controller Design Studio; enabling self-serve to address pre and post instantiation configuration use cases. | ONAP Any | 20 | 1h | Any | Zoom room | ||
ONAP MultiCloud Dublin Planning | ONAP team | Discussion | Go through list of proposals and prioritize the commitment in Dublin Release | ONAP Any | <15 | 1h | Wednsday 14:00-15:00 UTC | |||
Bin Yang | How to on-board one or multiple cloud regions | Best practices/Use Cases | Demo | a Live demo to showcase the multicloud capability of automate on-boarding of multiple edge clouds | ONAP Any | <15 | 30 | Any | ||
Weitao Gao | VNFSDK Weekly meeting | ONAP Committee/Team Mtg | Discussion | Weekly VNFSDK team meeting. Goal is to dive deeper into the scope of Dublin Release, | Any | 15-25 | 1 h | Wednesday morning (Paris time) | Room+Zoom | |
Xprojects collaboration on integration | ONAP integration team OPNFV Functest/Releng/Pharos | Discussion | OPNFV functional testing provides some trust indication on the major infrastructures (OpenStack and K8S). As ONAP is now installed on top of K8S usually on top of OpenStack, it is important to trust the infrastructure hosting ONAP deployement before running deployements and tests. OPNFV testing capabilities could be reused. Additionnaly Pharos resources could eventually be used by ONAP on top of OPNFV scenarios. | Integration Testing group | <15 | 1h | Any | |||
CCVPN Use Case Impacts on External API | ONAP CCVPN Team ONAP External API Team | Discussion | Discuss the impacts of the Dublin release CCVPN Use Case on External API from both a Legato (Northbound: BSS/OSS to ONAP) and Interlude (East/West: ONAP to ONAP) perspective. Also discuss MEF Interlude Alignment Could be done as a breakout. Request Wednesday breakout session due to participant availability. | ONAP | <15 | |||||
Stephen Terrill et al | Security sub-commitee report and dublin requirements | ONAP team | Presentation and discussion | Update from SECCOM, including preliminary draft generic security requirements, milestone checklist additions, casablance in review, Dublin requirements. | ONAP | 25-50 | 1hr | Any afternoon | ||
Security sub-committee dublin priorities | ONAP security team | Working discussion | Brainstorm to identify and prioritize dublin SECCOM focus topics | ONAP security | <15 | 30 mins | any afternoon | |||
Janne Suominen Mika Rautakumpu | Augmented Reality demo on Edge Cloud | Edge Networking | Demo | Augmented Reality demo on Edge Cloud using OpenEdge HW | Any | 25-50 | 30 mins | Wednesday, Thursday | ||
5G Use Cases follow-up: 3GPP PM Data file collection PNF sw upgrade CM configuration via Netconf | ONAP team | Presentation and discussion | 1 h | Any | ||||||
Let's Move Everything to Kubernetes | CloudNative | Presentation | Can Kubernetes be used as the delivery mechanism for "legacy" VNFs as well as CNFs, from data center to edge? Is it inevitable? Is it even a good idea? Now that I got your attention, I will propose the "KNFM" initiative, combining the following:
The technological ecosystem is almost there, it just needs an additional nudge to bring the pieces together. | ONAP | 25-50 | 1 h | Any | |||
Patrick Maguire | 5G: Network Slicing Use Case | ONAP team | Presentation and discussion | 5G Network Slicing Modeling and Orchestration in ONAP - use case presentation and discussion (please find materials here) | Any | 15-25 | 30min | Tue-Thu | Zoom room |
...