Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)
TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below
Non-TAC project reps do not count towards meeting quorum
X = Present | P = Proxy (Indicate in the table with @name for @name
| Chairperson | Vice-Chair | Security Seat | 5G-SBP |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONAP | OpenDaylight | Anuket | FD.io | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODIM | EMCO | XGVela | L3AF | Tungsten Fabric |
| Representing | Member | Representing | Member | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T | Infosys | |||
| China Mobile | vacant | Nokia | ||
| China Telecom | vacant | Red Hat | ||
| Cisco | Tech Mahindra | vacant | ||
| Deutsche Telekom | TELUS | |||
| Ericsson | Verizon | vacant | ||
vacant | Wallmart | |||
| Huawei | ZTE | |||
LF Staff: Casey Cain Kenny Paul David McBride LJ Illuzzi Ranny Haiby Sandra Jackson
Community: Cedric Ollivier , Nadathur Sundar Timo Perala
Agenda
- Start the Recording
- We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
- Roll Call
- Action Items Review
- Agenda Bashing
- General Topics
- TAC Chair Election
- D&TF
- LFN Infrastructure
- Induction Documentation
- Any Other Topics
Minutes
Quick Updates
- LFN Infrastructure - Confluence expected end of service - - The reports of Confluence death were greatly exaggerated. No need for further action and crisis avoided.
Induction Documentation
- https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/uQnxB
- Thank you for the thoughtful comments and suggestions.
- Comment by Frank Brockners about confusing language in induction criteria - Fixed
- Comments by Amy Zwarico - Need to explicitly call out the availability of security tools like NexusIQ - This should already be covered by LFX Security. Kenny Paul will reach out to LFX team to get clarification about Beta state of LFX security. LFX does not seem to have the beta disclaimer anymore. Beta comment removed.
- Comment by Amy Zwarico Muddasar Ahmed about the language in the Graduation Review regarding security - Fixed.
- Edits made to the archival reversal language based on Robert Vargas comments
- Vote: The TAC will vote on version 52 of the proposed documentation found at:
- https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/NgvxB
- #Agreed the TAC will adopt v52 of the proposed Lifecycle documentation