Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)

TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below 
Non-TAC project reps do not count towards meeting quorum

X = Present | P = Proxy  (Indicate in the table with @name for @name

MemberRepresenting
MemberRepresenting
MemberRepresenting
ODIM (sandbox)
Tech Mahindra
ODL (TAC)

@Anil Guntupalli 

Verizon
Cisco

L3AF (sandbox)


EMCO (sandbox)

IBM


TF (incubation)
AT&T
Huawei
Red Hat
ONAP (TAC)
China Mobile

Intel


Orange
Deutsche Telekom
Anuket (TAC)
ZTE
Juniper
China Telecom
Ericsson
Nokia
XGVela (sandbox)
FD.io (TAC)
Google

TBD

Walmart






TBD

Amdocs

LF Staff: Kenny PaulDavid McBride Ranny Haiby Sandra Jackson

Community:  Gergely Csatari, Timo Perala

Agenda

  • Start the Recording
  • We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
  • Roll Call
  • Action Items Review
  • Agenda Bashing
  • General Topics
  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

TAC Composition

  • discussion of Platinum seats
    • membership benefits - Ranny Haiby had a discussion w/ Arpit Joshipuraand Mike Woster - TAC should do what is right because there are plenty of other  membership benefits
    • Frank Brockners Is there a middle ground? If TAC members don't appear for some number of times then they lose their seat.
    • Review of long term attendance trends.  Kenny Paul screen shared the spreadsheet used to track attendance.
    • keep things as they are - for plats - do outreach and if no attendance they simply get administratively dropped from the roster
  • #AGREED the TAC supports drafting charter language to 1) the Committer Representative to the Board having a TAC voting seat, and 2) The TAC having the ability to appoint up to 2 seats.

Community Release Management

  • David McBride shared his slides previously presented to the SPC 
  • Discussion around requiring release managers as part of the lifecycle
    • slides edited live- removed some requirements and some language was changed 
  • Will come back to discuss staffed projects at the next meeting

Updates

Next Meeting:

  • New LF level network projects: Nephio & SONiC
  • June DTF
  • Discussion of currently staffed Release Management Projects

Action items

  • David McBride upload a PDF of the updated slides to these minutes.