Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)

TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below 

Community: Abhishek Kondur Alex Feiszli 

Agenda

• We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
  • Antitrust Policy
• Roll Call
• Check Action Items & Topic Requests
• General Topics
  • Netmaker project introduction - Netmaker team (30m)
  • Refreshed documentation approval
  • Security initiative -
    • status update.
    • Verifying we have the right points of contact.
    • Where are the projects on the security roadmap? What are they struggling with?
    • What is the TAC expected to do? Recommend? Enforce?
  • Proposal for TAC topics backlog - Muddasar Ahmed 
  • Edge Use Cases Lisa Caywood Olaf Renner  - What is the TAC role here?
    • How is it related to the other "threads" the TAC is dealing with (AI, Security, Edge)
• Any Other Topics

Action items

• Alex Feiszli to upload a copy of the slides to this minutes page 01 Nov 2023 
• Kenny Paul will connect Alex Feiszli to the Project Formation Team 10 Nov 2023 
• Casey Cain Robert Varga to define what roadblocks the ODL community is facing for completing their OpenSSF badging.  To be included on the Security tools adoption survey page. 22 Nov 2023 

Minutes

Netmaker Project Introduction

• Alex Feiszli introduced the Netmaker project to the LFN.
  
  • He announce that they are considering joining the LFN.
  • 
• Muddasar Ahmed do you have functional parity with any commercial solutions?
  • Alex Feiszli We tend to avoid hardware dependencies. 
    • If you are looking to do something simple like connecting sites, then maybe this isn't the solution for you.
    • We are also a mono-core repository currently.
    • The org name is the same as our project name and will need to be updated
  • We do not yet have a Technical Charter or a TSC
  • Kenny Paul suggested that we get Alex Feiszli in touch with the Linux Foundations project formation team.
    • A project charter is a great place to start
    • The Project formation team can help with suggestions for project names and 

Security

• Comments