You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 14
Next »
Materials:
CNTT_FMO.pptx
Attendees:
Topics:
- Anti-Trust Policies:
- Definition of Criteria for Decision making
- Setting Recurring Meetings Schedule
- Agreement on the options
- Keep current model with refinement of Scope, Roles, and Responsibilities
- Work toward Merging with OPNFV
- CNTT becomes a Working Group
- CNTT becomes a project
- Defining the Pros and Cons of the Current Model
Notes:
- Definition of Criteria for Decision making
- Goals & Outcomes
- Board has asked we make a decision
- CNTT doesnt seem to have an official place in LFN, and looks as thou it wont go away
- CNTT is consuming resources, thus Board whats to ensure work is supported
- Governance? Not a strong
- Original Intent was short term, however work appears to be longer term
- Work is important, much support from Community
- Criteria Is to Gaps in current model, what is the best plan of action - Evaluate options to develop best solution for community and present plan to board
- CNTT/OPNFV Session in the VC
- Disruptive between CNTT/OPNFV
- Need to have a full understanding of the responsibilities of CNTT in relationship to other LFN projects and the OPNFV.
- Need to understand the problem with current situation
- Setting Recurring Meetings Schedule
- Agreement on the options
- Keep current model with refinement of Scope, Roles, and Responsibilities
- Work toward Merging with OPNFV – could be done later, start with WG, with the intention to merge later as another nuance to this option
- CNTT becomes a Working Group
- CNTT becomes a project
- Friday Suggestion
- Work on Gaps, Issues, Scope,
- Defining the Pros and Cons of the Current Model