Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name) TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below Non-TAC project reps do not count towards meeting quorum
X = Present | P = Proxy (Indicate in the table with @name for @name
ONAP OpenDaylight Anuket FD.io ODIM EMCO XGVela L3AF Tungsten Fabric
Representing Member Representing Member AT&T Nokia China Mobile Orange China Telecom vacant Cisco Deutsche Telekom TELUS Ericsson Verizon Google Wallmart Huawei ZTE IBM
LF Staff: Casey Cain LJ Illuzzi Ranny Haiby Sandra Jackson
Community:
Agenda Start the Recording We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF. Roll Call Action Items Review Agenda Bashing General Topics2022 TAC 5G-SBP Seat Election - Congratulations Muddasar Ahmed 2023 Mentorships Developer & Testing Forum February 2023 Project Health Review scheduling December GB follow-up discussionsBroadening the scope of the technology outlook - Ranny Haiby We may want to broaden the technology scope - Should projects inducted to the LF become a part of LFN? Industry wide discussions we should pay attention to:Serverless (AWS Lambda) for network functions Identity and Ledger - could attract additional projects to LFN Expand into natural adjacencies Proposal to add a standing agenda item for "new technology" topics, that will be discussed and then lead to creation of write-up/recommendationsMaintain a list of tech topics, see who is interested in participating. Ranny Haiby will create the initial list on the wiki. Blueprint scope and goals - Ranny Haiby , Muddasar Ahmed Induction process Frank Brockners Is the bar too high for joining LFN? In reality we only ask for a documented governance and release process Is it just a perception problem? Nephio case in point - Perception was that joining the LF will require high degree of integration with existing LF projects. Concern about technical overlap with existing LFN projects. Action items We should review the sandbox induction checklist and make sure we are keeping the bar low enough. Add a MAC rep and discuss how to address common misconceptions Checkpoint on 2023 TAC Goals - Jason Hunt Any Other Topics Minutes Health Reviews
Looking to schedule for projects that did not participate at the end of last year Will also do for Security (Amy Zwarico in early March) and 5G Super Blueprint D&TF
Please submit presentation proposals no later than 27 Jan 2023 Conflicts with the O-RAN Alliance face-to-face; want to avoid such conflicts in the future. December GB Follow-up
Ranny Haiby provided an update on the GB topics.Frank Brockners We may want to broaden the technology scope - Should projects inducted to the LF become a part of LFN?Industry wide discussions we should pay attention to:Serverless (AWS Lambda) for network functions Identity and Ledger - could attract additional projects to LFN Expand into natural adjacencies - What projects do we want to invite?Suggest we have a regular discussion about "new technologies" at the TAC meeting Maintain a list of topics that we will discuss Induction Process Is the project formation process clear enough? We should review the induction process further. There is also a concern about technical overlap in other LFN projects We should also add our MAC rep to discuss how to reduce misconceptions 5G-SBP
Ranny Haiby There seems to be some confusion about what SBP is and isn't.Provide collaboration platform for building important technology solutions related to 5G networks
Action items Review LFN Induction process at next TAC meeting 01 Feb 2023 Casey Cain