View Source

Topic Description

Please enter a brief topic description here. Please do not add multiple paragraphs or meeting notes in this field.

Discussion regarding impact of RA2 updates and on CNF workloads RC2.

Path forward for RC2.

Please indicate your session type in the blank space below and then remove this Info field.

Demo / Informational (non-interactive)
- You may be asked to pre-record this session which will be made available on-demand.
Live Interactive Session

LFN Staff may elect to publish some videos to YouTube. Please indicate here if you do not want your session to be published to YouTube.

Live Interactive session

Please link slides here.

Open Dialog on Nile release RC-2 scope

Chapter 1
- There are no references to hyperscalers
  - 1.3. RC2 End User Requirements should be more agnostic and not limit the end users only to telecom service providers and vendtor
Chapter 4
- We should have references to RA2 Ch4 and not directly to CNCF CNF Testsuite
RA2 traceability
- Cross referencing RA2 requirements and RC2 tests is important and we should keep doing it
- Maybe the issue between release management and RC2 is in the milestone definitions
Anuket Assured vs CNF Conformance
- For the CNF suppliers it is a waste of effort to have both the CNCF CNF Conformance and the Anuket Assured for CNF-s (and OpenShift certification or any other certifications for that matter)
- RC2 and Anuket Assured should reuse the test cases defined in the CNCF CNF Testsuite, but should not refer to CNCF CNF Conformance as it is
- In the future we should think about the validity of Anuket Assured workload testing in the light of CNCF CNF Conformance.
Field trials
- Would drive adoption
- Important for Anuket to being relevant
- If anyone is interested in field trails please notify Scot Steele
Parking lot
- Discuss if the single process type requierment in the CNCF CNF Conformance test is a valid one in an RC2 meeting

Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date