Date

20 Oct 2020

Attendees

LF Staff: Jim Baker  Brandon Wick
Committee Members: Lei Huang Fernando Oliveira Beth Cohen Saad Ullah Sheikh  Marc-Alexandre Choquette   Ahmed El Sawaf Javier Ger  Olivier Augizeau  Ken KANISHIMA Muhammad Imran  Ryan Hallahan
Proxies:
Guests: Scott Blandford

Agenda

• Start the Recording
• Antitrust Policy
• Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)
• General Topics

  • 1. NFV testing whitepaper draft proposal - Saad Ullah Sheikh

    • Can we involve vendors who are leading below initiatives in our paper

    2.  Follow up items :

    • 5G adoption whitepaper:
      • Initiate 5G & intelligent network survey in EUAG - Lei Huang Saad Ullah Sheikh
      • 5G whitepaper contributions review - Saad Ullah Sheikh
    • Virtual Event post-mortem - Jim Baker
    • (DEFER) EUAG CSPs priorities for ONAP H Rel - Lei Huang Javier Ger
      • Lei Huang to share slides for future meeting
    • SDN survey needs refinement/focus 

Minutes

NFV Testing Automation white paper

• Saad Ullah Sheikh  reviewed the draft of the white paper
  • Requesting input from Orange
  • Scott Blandford  What is the purpose of the white paper?
    • Define recommendations of NFV automated testing architecture
  • Beth Cohen Let's get clear on target audience and motivation of reading paper
    • Operators and vendors can benefit from a best-practice and case study of architectures
  • The paper is a case study, NOT a EUAG position paper
  • Workspace for NFV testing automation white paper development
  • Follow up 03 Nov 2020 EUAG meeting

5G adoption white paper

• Lei Huang  Want to create a survey to focus on requirements for Intelligent Network and AI 27 Oct 2020 
  • eg. closed-loop AI and end-to-end testing driven by AI
  • Beth Cohen  creating a more concise version of the survey23 Oct 2020 
• Saad Ullah Sheikh 5G Adoption Experience white paper https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/awxoAg
  • Awaiting input from EUAG members as denoted in the text in workspace

Virtual Event Postmortem

• What went well
  • Meaningful conversations were had
  • Good attendance & engagement
  • Engaged ONAP and CVC teams
  • platform worked well
  • teamup calendar was useful
• What should we do differently next time
  • Continue to engage with ALL the open source communities in the future
  • Keep CNCF at the sessions as the containerized workloads grow in importance
  • Slack difficult to use inside corporate firewalls

Action items