The CNTT and OPNFV communities agree to follow the premises below and subscribe to the associated RACI chart for scope boundaries:

1. CNTT defines specifications and provides only the specifications to OPNFV
   • CNTT: Reference Model, Reference Architecture, Reference Implementation 
   • OPNFV: Reference Implementation, Reference Compliance
   • OVP: Testing, Badging 
2. OPNFV performs builds from the Reference Implementation specifications.  
3. "Cookbook" artifacts are the domain of OPNFV, CNTT should participate in the management of the cookbooks
4. A release management method including feedback loops is needed between OPNFV and CNTT. LFN/OPNFV has an existing meeting in which some of CNTT community will participate. 
   • CNTT Participants that will participate include Scot Steele, etc
5. Cross Community Collaboration must increase without overloading the participants.
   • Recommendation: WS Leads should identify WS participants that can attend the other community TSC meetings
   • Regularly held cross community meetings should be held. Community Chairs should schedule/delegate to community participants to implement/manage

General group agreement 

• The RACI doc and other docs related to the organization are all living docs.  
• Long term there will need to make a decision related to the final home for CNTT project work. – Vincent Danno
• We need to see how successful "1" arrangement is. → no need to rush in thinking about "2" and we still didn't figure out "1". I STRONGLY SUGGEST NOT TO RUSH INTO THIS WITHOUT FIGURE OUT "1" AND PROVE MODEL WORKS. Rabi Abdel

Questions need to be answered: Current Mode OPNFV/CNTT RACI Chart

• What happens when CNTT develop a requirement in, say, RI-1?
  • do CNTT goes directly to prospective OPNFV project and get it implemented (via that project PTL).
    • how are those implementation will link back to CNTT releases? 
    • Will each project has their own release cycle (with appropriate baggings) or will OPNFV has an overall release cadence ? how does the model work?
  • or will CNTT has to follow some kind of process to get their requirements implemented?
  • or will OPNFV itself regularly get CNTT releases and find the right OPNFV projects to implement any new requirements.
    • via CIRV?
  • what is the role of OPNFV TSC on all this? who is accountable for what?
  • we need to talk about accountability and make it clear who is accountable for what!
• How does OVP fit into this matrix?
• Given the GSMA process is it mostly a consumer and ratifier of the output from CNTT, or does it have a role in providing feedback?  I.e. how can this be set up to be a two way street?