Notes from Joint TUG/CNTT Meeting Part 1 (Gdocs version)

Overview of TUG and CNTT groups

Feedback:
- We should have a clear reference to things, like immutable infrastructure
- Maybe we should describe that CNF-s can be run on any cloud and even bare metal

Validation of the ToC of RA2. Are we discussing the right topics in RA2? (Gergely Csatari user-0322e )
- Reference Architecture table of contents
  - If we would like to be agile we need less standardisation
  - What if a new CNI is released after we fixed it?
  - Let's define only CNI capabilities ↔ define a list of CNI-s
- Cloud native
Validation of the principles we have in RA2 (user-0322e)
- Scope diagram:
  - It was asked if the genesis node is part of the RA → not
RI2
- Where will it be implemented (OPNFV or other)? → we do not know yet.
Validation of the different chapter content of RA2 (user-0322e)
Validation of gaps if we have any (user-0322e)

Where is this going? What needs to be added, updated, and/or removed to support K8s based platforms? What about hybrid platforms? (user-0322e )
Scoping of a RI-2 based on RA-2 (user-0322e)
ONAP collaboration with CNCF for test automation (Lingli Deng )

Business agility
CNTT assumes that there is a need for a Kubernetes based RA
CNCF TUG WP could cover this in a motivation of telecoms to move to cloud native
- Principle chapter have some of the motivations
- There are some problem statements on the CNCF TUG Google Drive