Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)

TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below 
Non-TAC project reps do not count towards meeting quorum

X = Present | P = Proxy  (Indicate in the table with @name for @name

MemberRepresenting
MemberRepresenting
MemberRepresenting
ODIM (sandbox)
Cisco
Samsung

@Anil Guntupalli 

Verizon

IBM


ODL (TAC)

@Anil Kapur 

Juniper
Huawei
TF (incubation)
AT&T
China Mobile
Intel
ONAP (TAC)
Deutsche Telekom
Red Hat
ZTE
Walmart
Anuket (TAC)
Ericsson
Orange
China Telecom
Tech Mahindra
Nokia
XGVela (sandbox)
FD.io (TAC)
Google









TBD

Amdocs

LF Staff: Casey Cain Kenny Paul Sandra Jackson Brandon WickLJ Illuzzi

Others: Bob Monkman, Md Irshad Sheikh , Igor Duarte Cardoso , cathy zhang , Ritu Sood , Sharad Mishra , Timo Perala , Shashikanth VH , Eric Multanen , Seshu Kumar Mudiganti

Agenda

  • Start the Recording
  • We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
  • Roll Call
  • Action Items Review
  • Agenda Bashing
  • General Topics
  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

EMCO Induction

  • EMCO Project Proposal presented to the TAC by Bob Monkman
  • Using Apache 2.0 - Seed code dropped yesterday.
  • TSC includes 11 appointed representatives
  • Technical content was reviewed by cathy zhang
  • Recommendation from TAC for EMCO to look at LFEdge Baeytl and Open Horizon  Projects as they are doing similar work.
  • Use cases would typically be cloud with workloads irrespective of near or far edge - Will work with ONAP community to better define use case scenarios.
  •  Looking for induction to LFN due to the current alinement to existing LFN communities 
  • Discussion of Committer growth and how to manage - will be using lessons learned from other LFN Projects to establish governance around establishing PTLs 
  • Discussion of what compute resources will be used; are they sufficient for a Sandbox project w/o LFN funding? - will used some pods inside the Intel Community Engagement lab  

Recommendations to be included w/ the vote

  • Address TSC growth model
  • Address PTL
  • Note Lab resource allocation
  • Resolution to recommend EMCO to the Governing Board


Action items

  •