Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Discuss/define remediation for Gaps, Issues, Scope between CNTT/OPNFV
    • Agreed on Areas 
      • Communications between the groups is lacking, and disruption in progress occurs because of it.
      • No agreed upon "RACI"
      • Few people are cross community, those that are are overworked
      • Feature/Function Stakeholder ownership is lost in Traceability Matrix
      • Stakeholders should help provide resources for feature/function development
      • Architect and engineer skills are decidedly different
      • No Aligned roadmaps
    • Action items
      • CNTT/OPNFV Requirements gathering processes should be the same with Stakeholders to remain identified and expected to provide resources
      • Need community roadmaps that are aligned, with potential long term "roadmap framework"that community roadmaps fit within.
      • Need to have more cross community participation without increasing number of meetings and participant workloads (Meeting analysis and effectiveness)
      • Identify ways to hold joint meetings to help reduce # and scope of meetings
      • Review how meetings are managed, with potential to have more effective ones.
      • Must get focused on developing Future Mode for LFN board Meeting on 6/17. Target 6/12 to complete work for board meeting.
      • Scot Steele  will manage work effort.
  • Define the Pros and Cons of the Current Model
    • Not discussed in detail
    • Will be addressed in future meetings
  • Open the discussion on FMO
    • Will be addressed in future meetings
  • Set recurring meeting schedule
    • One 30 minute and one 1hr meeting per week agreed upon. Targeting Tuesdays and Fridays.
    • Jim Baker and Scot Steele to work on schedule