Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Materials:

Attendees:

Topics:

Notes:

Notes:

        •  #110
          • Project plan with major milestones
          • Detail on what is expected (Nick can assist in ensuring expectations are met)
            • R1 stoop up in community lab, run RC1 against (what made sense? what didn't make sense? did the conformance suite work to test it?) kinda like a smoke test on CNTT community infra
            • RI1 stood up in Vendor lab, run RC1 against their own infra and give feedback (what made sense? what didn't make sense? did the conformance suite work to test it?)
            • VNF Vendor could come a try to stand up against both
        • Key Concern: Vendors concerned about optics. Needs to be a partnership with community to ensure what happens to results, who will have access to results, etc. Publishing rights. Etc. Provide a badge, so community would publish who owned the badge but not show necessarily what was passed. E.g. 85% passed = allotment of badge but not show results to all. 
      • Need to validate RI and RC suite makes sense.
      • Action - Need to clarify with vendors what we will share and what won't be shared as they are concerned about sharing the results.
        • They could run RC1 themselves and give us feedback on their results.
        • When results announced "Successfully implemented on RI, RC test passed, we used XYZ vendor, and passed it.
      • OPNFV current badge link: https://nfvi-verified.lfnetworking.org/#/
    (in session notes)

Appendix: