Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • RM Core (status) (Mark S.)
    • Issues
    • UNH lab hardware approval (if needed)
    • SR-IOV continuation (if needed)
    • EPA (if needed) //deferred
    • Hardware discussion continuation
      • Storage configuration (10x 960GB vs. 3.2TB w/ 3x logical)
      • DIMM distribution across sockets, memory controllers and buses
      • NIC to socket mapping
      • Physical interface assignment (E/W/OpenStack/Storage, N/S, PXE, OOB LOM)
      • Hardware Objectives, Guidelines and Approach
      • Guidelines vs. Requirements
      • Objectives and Drivers for CNTT to specify h/w
      • To what granularity
      • Implications for RM Comp, RC and RI

...

  • General
    •  None at this time
  •  Core
    •  None at this timeMXS: Follow up on rotating media for UNH servers
    •  MXS: Follow up on constraints precluding NVMe usage
    •  MXS: Write proposal for SRIOV language in RM (not transition plan)
  • Ops
    •  None at this time
  • Comp
    •  None at this time

Minutes:

  • General
    • Nil
     CoreNil
    • Reviewed LNF/GSMA anti-trust policy
  •  Core
    1. General discussion about UNH lap approval, Reached the following conclusions:
    2. Current PoR is 3.2TB of SSD behind a RAiD controller. ex[psed as
    3. Consensus is 3.2TB is probably too restrictive
    4. Trevor proposed we investigate supplementing the SATA SSDs with rotating media
    5. Ultimately concluded:
      1. CNTT RI to use an OSD, in snotead of hyper-converged
      2. Initially maintain homogeneous server fram forFR
      3. Investigate rotating media
      4. Investigate why NVMe i is not an option.
      5. Organization would be root volume on SDD on the host
    6. SRIOV: Aligned on creating transition plan as an appendix to the RM
    7. Mark S. took action to write a draft of the language for the RM regarding the SRIOV (not the annex or transition plan)
  • Ops
    • Nil
  • Comp
    • Nil