...
| Member | Representing | Member | Representing | Member | Representing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODIM (sandbox) | Cisco | Samsung | |||||||
@Anil Guntupalli | Verizon | IBM | ODL (TAC) | ||||||
| Juniper | Huawei | Szymon Golebiewski | TF (incubation) | ||||||
| AT&T | China Mobile | Intel | |||||||
| ONAP (TAC) | Deutsche Telekom | Red Hat | |||||||
| ZTE | TBD | WalmartBeth Cohen | Anuket (TAC) | ||||||
| Ericsson | Morgan RichommeOrange | China Telecom | |||||||
| Tech Mahindra | Nokia | XGVela (sandbox) | |||||||
| FD.io (TAC) | EMCO (sandbox)TBD | Amdocs |
LF Staff: Kenny Paul, Casey Cain, Heather Kirksey, Sandra Jackson, Trevor Bramwell , LJ Illuzzi
Others:
Agenda
- Start the Recording
- We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
- Roll Call
- Action Items Review
- Agenda Bashing
- General Topics
- SNAS & PNDA Archive Review Casey Cain
- SNAS Vote: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/MooZB
- PNDA Vote: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/MIoZB
- Project Code Management platform decisions Gergely Csatari
- TAC Composition and Goals Jason Hunt Casey Cain Discussion page: TAC Structure Brainstorming (2022)
- L3AF Casey Cain LJ Illuzzi
- Events
- March workshop
- June DTF
- SNAS & PNDA Archive Review Casey Cain
- Any Other Topics
Minutes
Topic 1
- Comments
Topic 2
- Comments
Action items
SNAS & PNDA Archive
- No stats available from SNAS as there has been no work - Community ack's the need to archive
- SNAS Vote: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/MooZB
- PNDA stats - https://insights.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/projects/lfn%2Fpnda/dashboard;quicktime=time_filter_3Y
- PNDA Vote: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/x/MIoZB
Code Management
- Al Morton Is there any restrictions on subprojects using different tooling for code management?
- Brian Freeman Agree that the TSC is accountable for Project & sub-project decisions
- Ed Warnicke Also agree that the TSC is accountable. - The FD.io TSC cannot - by design - force a sub project to do something
- Robert Varga TAC makes a recommendation, but Projects don't need to follow it.
- Ranny Haiby TAC makes recommendations only - Project TSC's are responsible for making the decision on the tools.
- Cedric Ollivier The decision should go down to the subprojects.
- #agreed the TAC will help with recommendations to a Project, ultimately it is the Project TSC which makes the decisions for the Project. TAC encourages project communities to collaboratively work out differences within the project before resorting to charter enforcement
TAC Composition and Goals
- Discussion page: TAC Structure Brainstorming (2022)
Upcoming Events
- 2022 LFN DTF Workshop April
- Narrowly focused on cross collaboration follow-ups from January
- 2022 LFN Developer & Testing Forum June
- - Registration is necessary - MUST HAVE for in person attendance
- Event will be focused on in-person attendees
- Remote attendance will be accommodated on a best effort basis as has been the case in the past
- Remote presenters will NOT be accommodated - Submitting a session proposal should be an acknowledgement that the person will be physically attending.
Action items
- Jason Hunt will follow up with LF-AI TAC on what they are looking at