Materials:
Attendees:
Topics:
- Walk On Items
- Governance – Baldy Priority Items
- Baldy Priority Items without owners
Notes:
- Walk On Items
- Governance – Baldy Priority Items
- F2F Planning - Governance Topic Solicitation (Brian Bearden, Rick Tennant, Scot Steele)
- AI - Add Session for Whitepaper
- AI - Increase time for MMA to 120 mins
- Possibly will not do plenary session with LFN, but can still do a CNTT-only plenary.
- Optional - have an introduction/newbie onboarding session depending on how many folks need it. In a parallel session.
- There is additional meeting space, tables, (atrium like) places to sit in open area–bring printouts.
- Baldy Priority Items without owners
- "Goal" Outline/define of what is needed in initial Field Trials from RC1/OVP #1100 - Brian Bearden
- What is overall scope and requirements for Field Trial (Business perspective)
- Who do we secure to do it
- Define MVP Support model
- Couple Operators
- Verizon is ready to do this.
- Couple NFVI Vendors with labs
- P1 - NFVI Vendor stand up an RI, then We/They would run RC1 against it
- P2 - NFV Vendor
- Make these into requirements
#1105
Notes:
- #110
- Project plan with major milestones
- Detail on what is expected (Nick can assist in ensuring expectations are met)
- R1 stoop up in community lab, run RC1 against (what made sense? what didn't make sense? did the conformance suite work to test it?) kinda like a smoke test on CNTT community infra
- RI1 stood up in Vendor lab, run RC1 against their own infra and give feedback (what made sense? what didn't make sense? did the conformance suite work to test it?)
- VNF Vendor could come a try to stand up against both
- Key Concern: Vendors concerned about optics. Needs to be a partnership with community to ensure what happens to results, who will have access to results, etc. Publishing rights. Etc. Provide a badge, so community would publish who owned the badge but not show necessarily what was passed. E.g. 85% passed = allotment of badge but not show results to all.
- Need to validate RI and RC suite makes sense.
- Action - Need to clarify with vendors what we will share and what won't be shared as they are concerned about sharing the results.
- They could run RC1 themselves and give us feedback on their results.
- When results announced "Successfully implemented on RI, RC test passed, we used XYZ vendor, and passed it.
- OPNFV current badge link: https://nfvi-verified.lfnetworking.org/#/
(in session notes)
Appendix:
- Work Items assigned to MMA
{"serverDuration": 132, "requestCorrelationId": "0a7d1ec0e2ad044f"}