Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Kenny Paul

Saved on

compared with

New Version 3

changes.mady.by.user N.K. Shankaranarayanan

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
  1. topics template confusing - needs to be streamlined
  2. remote presentations are a reality. we just need to be able to accommodate them more effectively
  3. Folks left off of presenters list. side effect of #1
  4. bridge snafus. 
    1. several presenters surprised that they needed to join the bridge.
    2. at least one hostid issue - bridge not set to join in advance so attendees got "waiting on host" until a member of staff joined.
  5. We had a couple of remote presentations. It worked out ok with some initial planning. Was clear for remote viewers.
    Not sure how it was for in-room particpants (projection to screen? speaker output in room?)
  6. For remote participants, in-room speaker's audio was good, but audio from people with mic in room was not always clear.
    (e.g. hearing comments during Magnus's presentation was less clear, hearing Martial during SON use case presentation was quite clear)