...
Gave quick update to Board on Wed
Personas
Personas deck last draft here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15A46C2I25ZD01mBoq7jIHzJu44n9fM7Gyd2ABPRzKuY/edit#slide=id.gdc21dff718_0_0
All edits captured in this deck?
Added Teddy the Tech Leader
Need to finalize
Proposed prioritization
1st: Susan, the open source advocate (prefer to call her ‘advocate’ vs ‘shepherd’)
2nd: Sally, the SW developer (where we typically target)
, follow up on proof points → Go directly. LS/BM→Rajesh. Mailing List, + EUAG, etc. Andre interview. Trying to advance the open source message, can't do it without.
Incorporate the Maturity Model, we are "influencing" what following in terms of trials, testing, deployments.
Review Honolulu updates for best stories → 1:1 asks.
Possible approach → Write the story/quote first, here's what we're thinking about.
Synch with Project.
What's the Ask? 3-4 User Stories to be used across the pillar. Where open source has been in action? Where has open source been used effectively? This is not early days, it's mature, ready to go.
Neal has a cost saving example.
Needs to tie back to a specific project --?> It's up to us to position this for the end user as part of the ask.
Different types of service providers, e.g. ITSP. VPP the best/only solution. Ask is short/pith questions, make it easy for them → final product 1 pager (per story) w/ quick elements to add to deck. Neal: Recuit a cost saving customer story (VPP), Lindsey/Bob, synch with Rajesh. Brandon/Heather to pitch the board as a whole (if OK), and follow up 1:1. Ranny: Dish in USA and Rakuten in Japan, very vocal about opens source. What are they doing: Team to check and compare.
Security: We need to weave this in throughout. Surface at least 1 proof point. (based on Amy preso). Message: Many eyes enhance security, see what's being done across the projects. Jill to review general LF messaging. Start with general → find something more. Leverage ONAP "stay cutting edge". Security top of mind.
Reaching out on project security summaries (due 5/28).
Personas
Personas deck last draft here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15A46C2I25ZD01mBoq7jIHzJu44n9fM7Gyd2ABPRzKuY/edit#slide=id.gdc21dff718_0_0
All edits captured in this deck?
Added Teddy the Tech Leader
Need to finalize
Proposed prioritization
1st: Susan, the open source advocate (prefer to call her ‘advocate’ vs ‘shepherd’)
2nd: Sally, the SW developer (where we typically target)
3rd: Olga the operations manager or Paula the P&L owner. If we agree this could be a top priority, we felt it might be good to get input from the enterprise EUAG on which role is more influential within their companies (the person lobbying the P&L Owner or the P&L Owner itself)
How to add P&L Owner? Get input from EUAG on prioritization. Next Steps for each: Develop/take a fine tuned version for each persona to the board.
Build it / run it / don't lose $$
Update list with latest / make proposal / need owner for top 3. Idea: Reference current pillars / assign offsite to polish on group input.
Meet Next Week on Friday? → further this without Lindsey elevator/pillars for each audience – > what would change and how → group discussion → assign owners.3rd: Olga the operations manager or Paula the P&L owner. If we agree this could be a top priority, we felt it might be good to get input from the enterprise EUAG on which role is more influential within their companies (the person lobbying the P&L Owner or the P&L Owner itself)
Process/Timeline/Next Steps
...