...
Questions need to be answered: Current Mode OPNFV/CNTT RACI Chart
- Cedric Ollivier How can it help the short term issues? an implementation is needed for the conformance on the VNF side and we need additional relevant resources in both sides: specifications (CNTT) and OPNFV (OPNFV)
- Cedric Ollivier How would be leverage on it in a long term view? We shouldn't reinvent the wheel every release - the current model works and the seperation between CNTT and OPNFV is clear for a few CNTT contributors
- How can it help the short term issues? an implementation is needed for the conformance on the VNF side and we need additional relevant resources in both sides: specifications (CNTT) and OPNFV (OPNFV)_ollivier: How can it help the
- What happens when CNTT develops a requirement in, say, RI-1?
- does CNTT goes directly to prospective OPNFV project and get it implemented (via that project PTL).
- how will the implementation link back to CNTT releases?
- Will each project have their own release cycle (with appropriate baggings) or will OPNFV have an overall release cadence ? how does the model work?
- or will CNTT has to follow some kind of process to get their requirements implemented?
- or will OPNFV itself regularly get CNTT releases and find the right OPNFV projects to implement any new requirements.
- via CIRV?
- what is the role of OPNFV TSC on all this? who is accountable for what?
- we need to talk about accountability and make it clear who is accountable for what!
- does CNTT goes directly to prospective OPNFV project and get it implemented (via that project PTL).
- How does OVP fit into this matrix?
- Given the GSMA process is it mostly a consumer and ratifier of the output from CNTT, or does it have a role in providing feedback? I.e. how can this be set up to be a two way street?
...