Page History

...

Questions need to be answered: Current Mode OPNFV/CNTT RACI Chart

• ollivier: How can it help the 
• What happens when CNTT develops a requirement in, say, RI-1?
  • does CNTT goes directly to prospective OPNFV project and get it implemented (via that project PTL).
    • how will the implementation link back to CNTT releases? 
    • Will each project have their own release cycle (with appropriate baggings) or will OPNFV have an overall release cadence ? how does the model work?
  • or will CNTT has to follow some kind of process to get their requirements implemented?
  • or will OPNFV itself regularly get CNTT releases and find the right OPNFV projects to implement any new requirements.
    • via CIRV?
  • what is the role of OPNFV TSC on all this? who is accountable for what?
  • we need to talk about accountability and make it clear who is accountable for what!
• How does OVP fit into this matrix?
• Given the GSMA process is it mostly a consumer and ratifier of the output from CNTT, or does it have a role in providing feedback?  I.e. how can this be set up to be a two way street? 

...

• RA-1 is the requirements and specs
• RI-1 is an example implementation (“example” word is used because no company is required to follow this exact lab setup / installer approach – it’s an example)

ollivier:

Does it mean that RI-1 would be strictly removed from CNTT repository?

Why not to consider Airship as an implementation amongst others which try to implement the CNTT requirements (RC is currently rather verified thanks to Functest SUT and Field trials).

I would agree to fully remove RI1 from CNTT but CNTT needs a reference implementation somewhere which passes RC sucessfully for the next steps (conformance of VNF/CNF).

By the way, it's becoming urgent to take CNTT results into account to find the best path (RI1 doesn't pass RC - we can't leverage on the existing resources allocated to Functest for the VNF conformance)

• RC-1 is a test conformance suite

...