Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Reviewed draft PR from beginning.

  • Jonathan Beltran should be prepared for Participant to enter field trial at different maturity-level, point in onboarding RI-1 process

  • Scot Steele Make as statement: These are the documents that are going to be used to assess for feasibility, utility, and effectiveness.
  • Jim Baker Proposed a User Story approach - As a admin, I need to, expected outcome. All agreed.
    • Who does the assessment?
    • Address a set of expected outcomes to each individual.
    • Write the questionnaire to address each
      • E.g. Cookbook
        • "As a system admin I want to use the cookbook to install the Ref I."
        • Was the cookbook complete?
        • What section needs?
      • Overambitious to get too granular.
    • Format
      • Theme (e.g. Feasibility, Utility, Effectiveness)
      • User Story

      • I want to .... so that....
      • Questions 
        • What had to be redone?
        • What had to be added?
        • Did you get stuck anywhere?
  • Good Idea - “Hello World VNF” Is there one that anyone has? Do any vendors have any?
  • Open Item – smoke test do all flavors of VNF Instantiation?
  • Action ItemScot Steele Get CIRV / Infra OPNFV team persons involved to start partnering/socializing approach
  • Edits
    • VNF Instantiation Loaded and Started Only
    • Change from Deploy, Config, Testing to Deploy and Validate
    • Add question to ask about correctness and completeness?
    • Change the language from standards to requirements
  • Pankaj Goyal Suggestion to keep away from evaluating RC-1 – more scope discussion needed

...