Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Agenda:

  • Informational.  Zoom change 9/11
  • Sections 8.1-8.3.  No open issues/feedback.  
  • Overall Status (CNTT Gov, 9/5)
    • Following status will be provided / read at the CNTT Gov call Thursday
      • Developing content - in progress for Ch 8
      • Follow-up CNTT > OPNFV > CVC alignment discussions planned for  
      • Test Case Gap Assessment (8.7.9) - email 9/4-9/5 socializing test category/case recommendations, soliciting feedback  
      • Formal OPNFV Proj Proposal
        •  Draft complete 8/22
        •  Entered into OPNFV 8/23
        •  CNTT Gov review 8/29, Feedback due 9/8
        •  OPNFV Community Review  , Feedback due  
        •  OPNFV TSC Vote/Approval  
      • (question)Exploring Need for Ref Implementation Lab
        • Potential RI recommendation
          • 8 servers = 4 compute + 3 control + jump host
            • supports parallel host profile/failover testing
            • supports rack failover scenarios
          • Logical separation across 2 racks, if not physical
          • 2nd environment desired for concurrent testing of different RIs/RMs = so, 16 servers altogether, across 4 racks
          • Same geographical location
        • Questions:
          • Is a 2nd env necessary?
          • If so, is there a need to separate two labs for GeoR testing?
          • Are 4 computes and 3 control nodes sufficient?  Are there any concerns? (similar to Pharos) 

...