Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents


Attendees

Members: Atul Purohit David Perez Caparros   Rabi Abdel @ramesh Ryan Hallahan  Shiby Parayil Trevor Cooper Vincent Scharf Brian Freeman Guy Meador Marc-Alexandre Choquette

Guests: Catherine Lefevre Saad Ullah Sheikh Lincoln Lavoie LIN MENG

LF staff: Jim Baker user-20f1f Heather Kirksey Kenny Paul Alan Blackburn 

EUAG Working Group proposal 2   

Atul Purohit  shared the slides

None of the current attendees were a part of the original formation of the EUAG!

Objective: Create more valuable engagement by focusing on important projects: ONAP (initially)

Focus areas: 

  • Carrier priorities for ONAP
    • get a catalog of service provider priorities
  • State of play
    • PoC examples and Production examples
  • Cross-carrier initiatives
  • Distribution strategy
    • MVP approach/platform maturity plan

Atul reviewed a set of "homework" for each of the CSPs to get more insight to the interests and actions of each of the CSPs

  • CSPs are to complete the 3 worksheets for review by 2019-05-07
  • We'll review the CSP inputs in the next EUAG meeting
  • At the 2019-05-21 meeting, we'll review the normalized view


OVP value proposition/MVP review 

Heather Kirksey Lincoln Lavoie


Heather presented the concept of a Minimum Valuable Product proposal

Asking for feedback on the assumptions and priorities of the MVP

Lincoln reviewed the progress to date on the OVP

  • We have basic "compliance" testing today
  • Next step is VNF "validation" testing - sitting atop a NFVI w/ONAP

?Is this a set of requirements?

Considerable discussion on the nature of the NFVI used for testing

Lifecycle management 

  • Instead of looking at the full range of LCM - focus on day0 (on-boarding & instantiation) activities

?Does this provide value for the CSPs in the Rel E timeframe?

Looking to finalize by end of April - will provide a final recap of the MVP by next meeting


Chat Log