Lei HuangJavier Ger=
Please review and summarize which of the requirements made it into ONA=
P Guilin and which will be carried forward to a future release; Compare spr=
eadsheet to ONAP Guilin requirement candidate list https://wik=
i.onap.org/x/LyJIB (spreadsheet to Jira numbers)
Received requirements from: Swisscom/TIM/STC/Vodafone/Orange/China Mobi=
le/NTT Labs/Bell Canada/AT&T/Telecom Argentina
Also need to prioritize the EUAG requirements AND represent the require=
ments in the ONAP TSC calls
Kenny Paul reminded the EUA=
G that the primary source of influence is allocation of resources
it was noted that the "what resources are you. contributing" column in =
the requirements summary got dropped from the spreadsheet for RelG
Atul Purohit to reach out to Catherine Lefevre to determine the best way to repr=
esent the EUAG requirements and arrange a call
EUAG beyond ONAP
EUAG was formed when several of the projects had their own advisory gro=
up, ONAP did not have one
How can we grow the understanding of the projects and EUAG representati=
on of each
Too much for any person to be familiar with all of the LFN Projects - P=
robably need to have subgroups
Proposal: round-robin project review- similar to TAC review, but geared=
to a different audience that may no know about a project.
How can EUAG help your community?
What feedback would be most valuable to your project?
Jim Baker to help coordinate a set of project summaries=
from the project technical leads in the EUAG