08:39:36	 From  Cédric Ollivier : We are writing far too much in Wiki. Wiki should be a first step refering the doc in tree.
08:40:09	 From  Cédric Ollivier : And we are mixing wiki and project management..
08:40:45	 From  Catherine Lefevre : should not the documentation be hosted where any user, developer will look first concerning a particular release? Release note ?
08:41:34	 From  Catherine Lefevre : it would be interested what other LF open source communities are doing? Maybe get a TAC recommendation?
08:41:49	 From  Cédric Ollivier : I like the fact that the release notes are currently in tree.
08:43:31	 From  Guillaume Lambert : Right, Cédric, - that's exactly the point - too many things are on the wiki and should be on the official documentation in a more maintenable format
08:44:00	 From  Cédric Ollivier : How to run spellcheck, linkcheck in wiki ;)
08:44:13	 From  Cédric Ollivier : +1
08:44:19	 From  Szymon Gołębiewski : +1
08:45:17	 From  Morgan Richomme : people jumping to other projects never clean their wiki pages, pages are never deprecated..that is why we got lots of misleading pages in wiki because no one feel really responsbile for the pages. The PTL are responsible for the consistency of the official documentation that is versioned, it is impossible to have the full view on a wiki, which is fully open by definition. 
08:45:32	 From  Ciaran Johnston (Ericsson) : We made a TSC decision on this, did we not?
08:45:37	 From  Ciaran Johnston (Ericsson) : https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc-vote/topic/71405726#1381
08:46:37	 From  Cédric Ollivier : Even worse when all good refs in wiki are squeezed between meetings minutes, votes, events...
08:48:16	 From  Catherine Lefevre : Ciaran, you are right but this topic today is not only about ONAP
08:49:08	 From  Ciaran Johnston (Ericsson) : Yes, sorry Catherine - just trying to show some prior art on a proposal for a potential split between wiki and under source control
09:04:35	 From  Ram Krishna Verma : https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Project+Team+Developer+Contribution+Requirements
09:05:06	 From  Catherine Lefevre : thank you Ram - can I add this topic sharing to ONAP ptl call on 1/8?
09:06:25	 From  Ram Krishna Verma : Yes, sounds good
09:06:34	 From  Catherine Lefevre : thanks Ram
09:15:09	 From  Catherine Lefevre : would it help to define template doc?
09:15:35	 From  Catherine Lefevre : so all projects will document the same way
09:16:10	 From  Cédric Ollivier : -1 when managing pull request dependencies
09:17:19	 From  Catherine Lefevre : +1 on Sylvain proposal
09:18:18	 From  Cédric Ollivier : gerrit -d
09:18:34	 From  Catherine Lefevre : i believe the architecture subcommittee defined template that the project follows to define their components
09:19:00	 From  Catherine Lefevre : i think for the release note, template also works
09:19:05	 From  Eric Debeau : yes, but RST
09:19:22	 From  Catherine Lefevre : so we should extend the concept to other docs that we need to create
09:19:37	 From  Eric Debeau : yes, templates are good, but enough to faciliatte entry point
09:19:50	 From  Catherine Lefevre : I agree it will not attract more contributors since we will ask the project team
09:20:02	 From  Catherine Lefevre : entry point - release note
09:20:14	 From  Catherine Lefevre : first thing that people are seing
09:20:28	 From  Catherine Lefevre : seeing
09:22:13	 From  Cédric Ollivier : @sylvain Each project should be able to select its best pr management :)
09:22:57	 From  Catherine Lefevre : thank you Eric, Guillaume for this session
09:22:57	 From  Sylvain Desbureaux (Orange) : @cedric of course! But today, it’s the contrary on LFN: we have to use Gerrit
09:23:10	 From  Catherine Lefevre : thanks Andreas
09:23:12	 From  Cédric Ollivier : @Sylvain for the best of OPNFV and ODL :)
09:23:35	 From  Cédric Ollivier : @Sylvain +1 to let ONAP switch to Gitlab if it pleases the community
09:23:57	 From  Sylvain Desbureaux (Orange) : Gitlab or GitHub, I don’t care ;)
09:24:17	 From  Cédric Ollivier : Github is not that good when managing 2 concurrent pull request
09:24:21	 From  Cédric Ollivier : see anuket.
09:28:49	 From  Catherine Lefevre : can we make an assessment about what it is missing per project basis?
09:29:07	 From  Catherine Lefevre : and define the min. baseline?
09:29:11	 From  Cédric Ollivier : Thx Guillaume, Eric et al.
09:29:19	 From  Catherine Lefevre : we could then try to have interns to help us