Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)

TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below 

LF Staff: Casey Cain Ranny Haiby LJ Illuzzi Sandra Jackson 

Community: Olivier Smith Tony Hansen 

Agenda

• We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
  • Antitrust Policy
• Check Action Items & Topic Requests (Backlog)
• General Topics
  • TAC Chair Election Casey Cain 
  • LFN Security Updates Amy Zwarico
  • LFN Quality Goals Casey Cain Olaf Renner  
• Any Other Topics

Action items

• TAC requests an update from the AI Taskforce 
• Casey Cain Olaf Renner to send an email about the Elected Seats and upcoming election 10 Jul 2024 
• Casey Cain Olaf Renner Muddasar Ahmed to prepare a proposal for integrating our Lifecycle into our GitHub similar to CNCF.  19 Jul 2024 

Minutes

Elections

• Chair self-nomination period has ended.  Olaf is the nominee.  
  • Casey Cain will send an email to confirm
• Vice-Chair election will begin immediately after the TAC call
• Security & 5G-SBP seats are up for election
  • A discussion ensued regarding if we should change one of the seats to an AI seat or add a third elected seat.
  • Casey & Olaf will initiate a discussion with the community for feedback.

Security update from Amy Zwarico 

• Amy Zwarico demonstrated the updates to the Security Best Practices
  
  • There was a discussion about meeting the quality goals for the Projects.
  • Amy suggested that there would need to be a regular health review to ensure that projects are progressing and maintaining their security best practices
    • Casey reminded the TAC that our Lifecycle documentation states that the projects should be doing an annual Health Review.  It has not been consistent due to the additional business before the TAC.  
    • Amy suggested that this needs to be a higher priority for the Projects and TAC.
    • Communication to the Projects that they will need to provide an update on their progress to Security Best Practices score
    • Update process for health reviews
      • A discussion was held about kicking off a new repo to start tracking our Lifecycle process and security best practices
      • A request for proposal at the next TAC meeting was made